[PATCH] D16838: [LoopUnrolling] Try harder to avoid rebuilding LCSSA when possible.
Justin Bogner via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Feb 3 11:56:21 PST 2016
Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com> writes:
> mzolotukhin created this revision.
> mzolotukhin added reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, bogner, joker.eph.
> mzolotukhin added a subscriber: llvm-commits.
>
> In r255133 (reapplied r253126) we started to avoid redundant
> recomputation of LCSSA after loop-unrolling. This patch moves one step
> further in this direction - now we can avoid it for much wider range
> of loops, as we start to look at IR and try to figure out if the
> transformation actually breaks LCSSA phis or makes it necessary to
> insert new ones.
>
> In future we might go even further and try to fix LCSSA in-place
> rather than rebuilding it, but I'm not quite sure yet that it's always
> possible (and computationally cheaper). Anyway, this patch seems to be
> aligned with that direction.
>
> One of the most important use-cases that previous implementation
> didn't handle is loops with calls that might throw an exception. Such
> loops have exits from entire loop nest, but we still don't need to
> recompute LCSSA after unrolling, as such exits usually don't contain
> LCSSA phis.
>
> The patch was tested on LNT testsuite + SPECS, neither failures nor
> significant compile time changes were spotted.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D16838
>
> Files:
> lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
>
> Index: lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
> +++ lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
> @@ -218,10 +218,16 @@
> bool CompletelyUnroll = Count == TripCount;
> SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitBlocks;
> L->getExitBlocks(ExitBlocks);
> - Loop *ParentL = L->getParentLoop();
> - bool AllExitsAreInsideParentLoop = !ParentL ||
> - std::all_of(ExitBlocks.begin(), ExitBlocks.end(),
> - [&](BasicBlock *BB) { return ParentL->contains(BB); });
> +
> + // Go through all exits of L and see if there are any phi-nodes there. We just
> + // conservatively assume that they're inserted to preserve LCSSA form, which
> + // means that complete unrolling might break this form. We need to either fix
> + // it in-place after the transformation, or entirely rebuild LCSSA. TODO: For
> + // now we just recompute LCSSA for the outer loop, but it should be possible
> + // to fix it in-place.
> + bool NeedToFixLCSSA = CompletelyUnroll &&
> + std::any_of(ExitBlocks.begin(), ExitBlocks.end(),
> + [&](BasicBlock *BB) { return isa<PHINode>(BB->begin()); });
>
> // We assume a run-time trip count if the compiler cannot
> // figure out the loop trip count and the unroll-runtime
> @@ -308,6 +314,7 @@
> LoopBlocksDFS::RPOIterator BlockBegin = DFS.beginRPO();
> LoopBlocksDFS::RPOIterator BlockEnd = DFS.endRPO();
>
> + std::vector<BasicBlock*> UnrolledLoopBlocks = L->getBlocks();
> for (unsigned It = 1; It != Count; ++It) {
> std::vector<BasicBlock*> NewBlocks;
> SmallDenseMap<const Loop *, Loop *, 4> NewLoops;
> @@ -387,6 +394,7 @@
> Latches.push_back(New);
>
> NewBlocks.push_back(New);
> + UnrolledLoopBlocks.push_back(New);
> }
>
> // Remap all instructions in the most recent iteration
> @@ -476,8 +484,12 @@
> if (Term->isUnconditional()) {
> BasicBlock *Dest = Term->getSuccessor(0);
> if (BasicBlock *Fold = FoldBlockIntoPredecessor(Dest, LI, SE,
> - ForgottenLoops))
> + ForgottenLoops)) {
> std::replace(Latches.begin(), Latches.end(), Dest, Fold);
> + UnrolledLoopBlocks.erase(std::remove(UnrolledLoopBlocks.begin(),
> + UnrolledLoopBlocks.end(), Dest),
> + UnrolledLoopBlocks.end());
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -530,15 +542,38 @@
> if (CompletelyUnroll)
> LI->markAsRemoved(L);
>
> + // After complete unrolling most of the blocks should be contained in OuterL.
> + // However, some of them might happen to be out of OuterL (e.g. if they
> + // precede a loop exit). In this case we might need to insert PHI nodes in
> + // order to preserve LCSSA form.
> + // We don't need to check this if we already know that we need to fix LCSSA
> + // form.
> + // TODO: For now we just recompute LCSSA for the outer loop in this case, but
> + // it should be possible to fix it in-place.
> + if (OuterL && CompletelyUnroll && !NeedToFixLCSSA) {
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < UnrolledLoopBlocks.size(); ++i) {
> + BasicBlock *BB = UnrolledLoopBlocks[i];
> + if (LI->getLoopFor(BB) == OuterL)
> + continue;
> + for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I) {
> + for (unsigned OpI = 0, OpE = I->getNumOperands(); OpI < OpE; ++OpI) {
> + if (auto Def = dyn_cast<Instruction>(I->getOperand(OpI)))
I think you can use ranged for for these loops:
for (Instruction &Inst : BB) {
for (Use &U : BB.operands()) {
if (auto Def = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U))
...
> + if (LI->getLoopFor(Def->getParent()) == OuterL)
> + NeedToFixLCSSA = true;
We should be able to break out early here, no?
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> // If we have a pass and a DominatorTree we should re-simplify impacted loops
> // to ensure subsequent analyses can rely on this form. We want to simplify
> // at least one layer outside of the loop that was unrolled so that any
> // changes to the parent loop exposed by the unrolling are considered.
> if (DT) {
> if (!OuterL && !CompletelyUnroll)
> OuterL = L;
> if (OuterL) {
> - bool Simplified = simplifyLoop(OuterL, DT, LI, SE, AC, PreserveLCSSA);
> + simplifyLoop(OuterL, DT, LI, SE, AC, PreserveLCSSA);
Can simplifyLoop return false when NeedToFixLCSSA = true? If so, do we
still need to fix LCSSA?
>
> // LCSSA must be performed on the outermost affected loop. The unrolled
> // loop's last loop latch is guaranteed to be in the outermost loop after
> @@ -548,7 +583,7 @@
> while (OuterL->getParentLoop() != LatchLoop)
> OuterL = OuterL->getParentLoop();
>
> - if (CompletelyUnroll && (!AllExitsAreInsideParentLoop || Simplified))
> + if (CompletelyUnroll && NeedToFixLCSSA)
CompletelyUnroll is kind of redundant here, since there's no path where
we set NeedToFixLCSSA = true where we didn't check CompletelyUnroll
already.
> formLCSSARecursively(*OuterL, *DT, LI, SE);
> else
> assert(OuterL->isLCSSAForm(*DT) &&
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list