[PATCH] D16173: [ThinLTO] Do not mark linkonce symbols as preempted in ThinLTO backends

[Teresa Johnson via llvm-commits]

tejohnson added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16173#338468, @joker.eph wrote:

> It seems to me that you are changing the ODR resolution compared to a regular FullLTO where the %t2 copy of f() would be selected. I don't know how much it is a problem.


Although it won't change it compared to a non-LTO link in the same order (where none would be preempted).

Rafael?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16173