[PATCH] D16614: Use "long long int" when checking whether atomics are supported.

Vasileios Kalintiris via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 27 02:36:42 PST 2016

Previous message: [PATCH] D16614: Use "long long int" when checking whether atomics are supported.
Next message: [PATCH] D16614: Use "long long int" when checking whether atomics are supported.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Why is this relevant for LLVM? I would call using 64bit atomics on 32bit
> architectures a bug waiting to happen.
> 
> Joerg

Doesn't libatomic provide software implementation of atomic ops whose size isn't supported natively by using barriers, locks, etc.?

- Vasileios

Previous message: [PATCH] D16614: Use "long long int" when checking whether atomics are supported.
Next message: [PATCH] D16614: Use "long long int" when checking whether atomics are supported.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list