[PATCH] D16463: [DAGCombiner] Don't add volatile or indexed stores to ChainedStores

[Junmo Park via llvm-commits]

flyingforyou added a comment.

Hi Ana.

I am amazed that your first approch is almost same with my first patch.
But the last patch is extending `replaceStoreChain`. (This is not what I am doing in this patch.)

What is the proper decision about this patch? (Transfer the test case, Abandon?)
Let me know, please.

Junmo.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16463