[PATCH] D14715: [Polly] Loop versioning after code generation (WIP)

[Mailing List "llvm-commits" via llvm-commits]

llvm-commits added a comment.

Polly has to become a SCC pass anyway in order to make parallelization
valid (and allow inter-procedural analysis), thus this should not be a
concern. However, it seems odd and expensive to create a function only
to inline it again, so we might not want to do that.

- F1173875: signature.asc <http://reviews.llvm.org/F1173875>
- F1173874: msg-2245-328.txt <http://reviews.llvm.org/F1173874>


http://reviews.llvm.org/D14715