[PATCH] D14972: [safestack] Protect byval function arguments.
Peter Collingbourne via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 25 19:07:49 PST 2015
There's not much we can do about inallocah because it represents an ABI break if we move them to the unsafe stack. This only affects windows right?
Peter
On November 25, 2015 7:01:30 PM PST, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote:
>majnemer added a subscriber: majnemer.
>majnemer added a comment.
>
>Do you also need to handle `inalloca`?
>
>
>Repository:
> rL LLVM
>
>http://reviews.llvm.org/D14972
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20151125/78411dfc/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list