[PATCH] D14918: [tsan] Fix CallocOverflow unit test on OS X

[Kuba Brecka via llvm-commits]

kubabrecka added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D14918#294890, @dvyukov wrote:

> Can we use __interceptor_calloc instead like in other tests? Behavior in such case will be closer to user programs as the interceptor can also contain some logic.


Sure, I'll update the patch.  (I thought user_calloc is more consistent with the rest of this file, which uses user_alloc and user_free.)


http://reviews.llvm.org/D14918