[PATCH] D14769: [FunctionAttrs] Calls to libcalls don't cause a function to potentially recurse
Duncan Exon Smith via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 18 10:26:45 PST 2015
Yeah, this would have been nice :(. There might be something you can do for certain LLVM intrinsics?
> On Nov 18, 2015, at 5:00 AM, James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> wrote:
>
> jmolloy abandoned this revision.
> jmolloy added a comment.
>
> Hi Duncan,
>
> Damn, you're right. I didn't even consider atexit handlers. And that noreturn case is true too. I'll abandon this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> James
>
>
> Repository:
> rL LLVM
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D14769
>
>
>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list