[PATCH] D12345: [Reassociate]: Add intermediate subtract instructions created while negating to be redone later for more reassociate opportunities
Chad Rosier via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 16 04:57:53 PST 2015
+1 as well.
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 3:52 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> SGTM then.
>
>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Nov 13, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Owen Anderson via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not opposed, I'd like to see compile time numbers first since it transforms reassociate into an iterative algorithm.
>>>
>>> I’ll see what I can get you on that.
>>
>> I measured the compile time impact on “opt -O3” on a single-bitcode-file for all of opt itself.
>>
>> — Reassociate accounts for about 0.5% of total time.
>> — I had a hard time getting stable numbers, but assuming the worst case Reassociate regresses about 2%.
>>
>> I would consider this firmly below the noise floor.
>>
>> —Owen
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20151116/b036a97c/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list