[PATCH] D13741: Introduce a *draft* of a code of conduct for the LLVM community and theassociated reporting guide.

[Rafael Espíndola via llvm-commits]

I still think this doesn't convey the intention of codifying, not
changing, how we operate.

We never had an issue with nicks like sabre or expressions like "cargo
cult". I don't think we should open the door to that.

Wordsmith is not my strong point, but how about

---------------------------------------------------
The LLVM community has always worked to strike a balance between open
communication and being  a welcoming and respectful community. We want
to ensure that doesn't change as we grow and evolve.

A vast example of past community interaction is available online. This
document intends to codify that in a few ground rules that we ask
people to adhere to.
----------------------------------------

Cheers,
Rafael

On 20 October 2015 at 05:29, Renato Golin via llvm-commits
<llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> rengolin added a comment.
>
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741#270863, @chandlerc wrote:
>
>> Renato, to your primary comment, I think that the discussion of that is a very substantive discussion, and so is better held on the llvm-dev thread, and not here. As I have said, I'm trying to only focus on highly mechanical issues here because the patch review has substantially less visibility to the community.
>
>
> When you moved the text here, I took it as the "right" place to discuss all and honestly didn't read the description. Sorry about that.
>
> I'll continue the two main topics on the list.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: docs/CodeOfConduct.rst:35
> @@ +34,3 @@
> +  people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes, but is not limited
> +  to members of any race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, colour,
> +  immigration status, social and economic class, educational level, sex, sexual
> ----------------
> Such a long list of small items will be weird as a bullet list... and I agree a block quote will call out for attention more than the main point. If the list wasn't that long, the formatting problem would be greatly reduced.
>
> ================
> Comment at: docs/ReportingGuide.rst:48
> @@ +47,3 @@
> +You will receive an email from the advisory committee acknowledging receipt
> +within 24 hours (and we will aim to respond much quicker than that).
> +
> ----------------
> This is just a wording issue. I think "as soon as possible" is the best in an international context. There is very little room for interpretation other than what everyone already knows it means.
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits