[PATCH] D13814: Add support for SHF_MERGE sections
Rafael EspĂndola via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 19 12:08:36 PDT 2015
On 19 October 2015 at 13:39, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> ruiu added a comment.
>
> I don't think splitting the loop would produce substantially duplicated code. Even if code in total gets larger, it's a good thing to do as long as each loop becomes more clear. I didn't try that myself though. You can leave it as is for now if you want. I'll take a look at that later.
OK. Note that the loop reduced a bit with r250702. If reducing it
further my suggestion would be to put the body in a helper function.
> Mix of Base and llvm::object::ElfFile<ELFT> looks a bit odd. I'd always use llvm::object::ElfFile<ELFT> because that is one less indirection.
Done.
> ================
> Comment at: ELF/OutputSections.cpp:467-468
> @@ -448,1 +466,4 @@
> + Offset += getAddend<ELFT>(RI);
> + Offset -= (Offset % Section->getSectionHdr()->sh_entsize);
> + return VA + cast<MergeInputSection<ELFT>>(Section)->getOffset(Offset);
> }
> ----------------
> Is this correct? Offset is a rounded value, and the return value does not seem to include the information you discarded using the % operator.
No. Very nice catch. I will upload a new patch in a minute.
> ================
> Comment at: ELF/OutputSections.h:208
> @@ +207,3 @@
> +private:
> + // This map is used to find if we already have an etry for a given value and,
> + // if so, at what offset it is.
> ----------------
> entry (typo)
Fixed.
Cheers,
Rafael
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list