[PATCH] D13666: Add an (optional) identification block in the bitcode

[Chandler Carruth via llvm-commits]

chandlerc added a comment.

I wonder if this should have two components, one for the epoch and one for the string? I'm worried about the fact that you're using the only "unused" ID here, and it does seem nice to not use two IDs for this kind of data.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D13666