[PATCH] D12464: Add way to test for builtin TargetOpcode

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits]

arsenm added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12464#258300, @ab wrote:

> With '<' -> '<=', seems reasonable.
>
> Can you add a comment?  I'm not sure we refer to these as "builtins" anywhere else (not that I have a better name though).


I got this from the BUILTIN_OP_END. The comment at the start of the enum calls these "Invariant opcodes" but that doesn't sound good. How about isGenericOpcode()?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D12464