[polly] r249139 - [FIX] Do not hoist from inside a non-affine subregion
Johannes Doerfert via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 2 07:51:00 PDT 2015
Author: jdoerfert
Date: Fri Oct 2 09:51:00 2015
New Revision: 249139
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=249139&view=rev
Log:
[FIX] Do not hoist from inside a non-affine subregion
We have to skip accesses in non-affine subregions during hoisting as
they might not be executed under the same condition as the entry of
the non-affine subregion.
Added:
polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/NonAffine/invariant_loads_dependent_in_non_affine_region.ll
Modified:
polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp
polly/trunk/test/Isl/CodeGen/non-affine-phi-node-expansion.ll
Modified: polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp?rev=249139&r1=249138&r2=249139&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp (original)
+++ polly/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScopInfo.cpp Fri Oct 2 09:51:00 2015
@@ -2396,6 +2396,8 @@ void Scop::hoistInvariantLoads() {
// zero iterators, are by construction invariant, though we
// currently "hoist" them anyway.
+ BasicBlock *BB = Stmt.isBlockStmt() ? Stmt.getBasicBlock()
+ : Stmt.getRegion()->getEntry();
isl_set *Domain = Stmt.getDomain();
MemoryAccessList InvMAs;
@@ -2403,6 +2405,11 @@ void Scop::hoistInvariantLoads() {
if (MA->isImplicit() || MA->isWrite() || !MA->isAffine())
continue;
+ // Skip accesses in non-affine subregions as they might not be executed
+ // under the same condition as the entry of the non-affine subregion.
+ if (BB != MA->getAccessInstruction()->getParent())
+ continue;
+
isl_map *AccessRelation = MA->getAccessRelation();
if (isl_map_involves_dims(AccessRelation, isl_dim_in, 0,
Stmt.getNumIterators())) {
Modified: polly/trunk/test/Isl/CodeGen/non-affine-phi-node-expansion.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/polly/trunk/test/Isl/CodeGen/non-affine-phi-node-expansion.ll?rev=249139&r1=249138&r2=249139&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- polly/trunk/test/Isl/CodeGen/non-affine-phi-node-expansion.ll (original)
+++ polly/trunk/test/Isl/CodeGen/non-affine-phi-node-expansion.ll Fri Oct 2 09:51:00 2015
@@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:12
%struct.wombat = type {[4 x i32]}
-; CHECK: polly.preload.begin:
-; CHECK-NEXT: %polly.access.B = getelementptr i32, i32* %B, i64 0
-; CHECK-NEXT: %polly.access.B.load = load i32, i32* %polly.access.B
-; CHECK-NOT: %polly.access.B.load = load i32, i32* %polly.access.B
+; CHECK-NOT: polly.preload.begin:
+; CHECK-NOT:: %polly.access.B
+; CHECK-NOT: %polly.access.B.load
; CHECK: polly.stmt.bb3.entry: ; preds = %polly.start
; CHECK: br label %polly.stmt.bb3
Added: polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/NonAffine/invariant_loads_dependent_in_non_affine_region.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/NonAffine/invariant_loads_dependent_in_non_affine_region.ll?rev=249139&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/NonAffine/invariant_loads_dependent_in_non_affine_region.ll (added)
+++ polly/trunk/test/ScopInfo/NonAffine/invariant_loads_dependent_in_non_affine_region.ll Fri Oct 2 09:51:00 2015
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-scops -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
+;
+; void f(int *A, int *B, int *C) {
+; for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
+; if (A[i] == *B)
+; A[i] = *C;
+; }
+;
+; Check that only the access to *B is hoisted but not the one to *C.
+;
+; CHECK: Invariant Accesses: {
+; CHECK: ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
+; CHECK: { Stmt_for_body__TO__if_end[i0] -> MemRef_B[0] };
+; CHECK: Execution Context: { : }
+; CHECK: }
+;
+; CHECK: Statements {
+; CHECK: Stmt_for_body__TO__if_end
+; CHECK: ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
+; CHECK: { Stmt_for_body__TO__if_end[i0] -> MemRef_C[0] };
+; CHECK: }
+
+;
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+
+define void @f(i32* %A, i32* %B, i32* %C) {
+entry:
+ br label %for.cond
+
+for.cond: ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
+ %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ], [ 0, %entry ]
+ %exitcond = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv, 1000
+ br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end
+
+for.body: ; preds = %for.cond
+ %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %A, i64 %indvars.iv
+ %tmp = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+ %tmp1 = load i32, i32* %B, align 4
+ %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %tmp, %tmp1
+ br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %if.end
+
+if.then: ; preds = %for.body
+ %tmp2 = load i32, i32* %C, align 4
+ %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %A, i64 %indvars.iv
+ store i32 %tmp2, i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
+ br label %if.end
+
+if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body
+ br label %for.inc
+
+for.inc: ; preds = %if.end
+ %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
+ br label %for.cond
+
+for.end: ; preds = %for.cond
+ ret void
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list