[PATCH] D12985: [ARM] Take into account address spaces in interleaved access vectorization
silviu.baranga@arm.com via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 24 04:11:19 PDT 2015
sbaranga added a comment.
Thanks, Jeroen!
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12985#252574, @jketema wrote:
> This now upgrades the vld[234] and vst[234] intrinsics to take into account an address space, as discussed.
>
> Open issues as far as I'm concerned:
>
> - Should vld1 and vst1 also be upgraded for uniformity? Similarly for the vld[234]lane and vst[234]lane instructions?
They seem to have the same issues, so I would say yes.
> - Should all the tests referring to vld[234] and vst[234] be updated to use the new intrinsic names, or are they allowed to depend on the auto-upgrade code?
I think they should use the new names, and have different tests to check that the old ones get auto-upgraded.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12985
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list