[PATCH] D12337: [Codegen] Ensure stack is properly aligned for call argument initialization
Jeroen Ketema via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 15 13:35:25 PDT 2015
jketema added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/llvm/CodeGen/CallingConvLower.h:274-279
@@ -272,4 +273,8 @@
- unsigned getNextStackOffset() const { return StackOffset; }
+ /// getNextStackOffset - Return the stack offset needed to be able to store
+ /// all stack slots according to their alignment requirements.
+ unsigned getNextStackOffset() const {
+ return RoundUpToAlignment(StackOffset, MaxStackArgAlign);
+ }
/// isAllocated - Return true if the specified register (or an alias) is
----------------
rnk wrote:
> Yes, but here's the 32-bit test case I'm imagining:
> void f(__m128 v, const char *f, ...) {
> va_list ap;
> va_start(ap, f);
> int d = va_arg(ap, int);
> }
> Do we have padding between 'f' and the variadic int parameter? I think the answer should be know, because if they were not variadic, they would not have padding between them.
>
>
Sorry, I missed this before I bumped. Somehow the system didn't sent me a notification email.
I don't see why this is a problem, my patch only changes the alignment of the whole frame, not the padding between the individual members; the computation for that stays unchanged. Hence, there will only be additional padding after the very last of the variadic parameters supplied.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12337
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list