[llvm] r247700 - 80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC...

[Aaron Ballman via llvm-commits]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-commits
<llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: spatel
> Date: Tue Sep 15 10:26:25 2015
> New Revision: 247700
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247700&view=rev
> Log:
> 80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC80-cols; NFC

I'm confused, is this an 80-col, NFC fix? ;-)

~Aaron

>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp?rev=247700&r1=247699&r2=247700&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp Tue Sep 15 10:26:25 2015
> @@ -967,13 +967,14 @@ bool CallAnalyzer::analyzeBlock(BasicBlo
>      if (isa<ExtractElementInst>(I) || I->getType()->isVectorTy())
>        ++NumVectorInstructions;
>
> -    // If the instruction is floating point, and the target says this operation is
> -    // expensive or the function has the "use-soft-float" attribute, this may
> -    // eventually become a library call.  Treat the cost as such.
> +    // If the instruction is floating point, and the target says this operation
> +    // is expensive or the function has the "use-soft-float" attribute, this may
> +    // eventually become a library call. Treat the cost as such.
>      if (I->getType()->isFloatingPointTy()) {
>        bool hasSoftFloatAttr = false;
>
> -      // If the function has the "use-soft-float" attribute, mark it as expensive.
> +      // If the function has the "use-soft-float" attribute, mark it as
> +      // expensive.
>        if (F.hasFnAttribute("use-soft-float")) {
>          Attribute Attr = F.getFnAttribute("use-soft-float");
>          StringRef Val = Attr.getValueAsString();
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits