[llvm] r246953 - Prune utf8 chars in comments.
NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Sep 6 17:26:55 PDT 2015
Author: chapuni
Date: Sun Sep 6 19:26:54 2015
New Revision: 246953
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=246953&view=rev
Log:
Prune utf8 chars in comments.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Mips/AsmParser/MipsAsmParser.cpp
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Mips/AsmParser/MipsAsmParser.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Mips/AsmParser/MipsAsmParser.cpp?rev=246953&r1=246952&r2=246953&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Mips/AsmParser/MipsAsmParser.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/Mips/AsmParser/MipsAsmParser.cpp Sun Sep 6 19:26:54 2015
@@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ bool MipsAsmParser::processInstruction(M
if (JalSym->isInSection() || JalSym->isTemporary()) {
if (isABI_O32()) {
// If it's a local symbol and the O32 ABI is being used, we expand to:
- // lw  $25, 0($gp)
+ // lw $25, 0($gp)
// R_(MICRO)MIPS_GOT16 label
// addiu $25, $25, 0
// R_(MICRO)MIPS_LO16 label
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ bool MipsAsmParser::processInstruction(M
} else if (isABI_N32() || isABI_N64()) {
// If it's a local symbol and the N32/N64 ABIs are being used,
// we expand to:
- // lw/ld  $25, 0($gp)
+ // lw/ld $25, 0($gp)
// R_(MICRO)MIPS_GOT_DISP label
// jalr $25
const MCExpr *GotDispRelocExpr = evaluateRelocExpr(JalExpr, "got_disp");
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp?rev=246953&r1=246952&r2=246953&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp Sun Sep 6 19:26:54 2015
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ Value *LibCallSimplifier::optimizeFMinFM
return nullptr;
// No-signed-zeros is implied by the definitions of fmax/fmin themselves:
// "Ideally, fmax would be sensitive to the sign of zero, for example
- // fmax(â0. 0, +0. 0) would return +0; however, implementation in software
+ // fmax(-0. 0, +0. 0) would return +0; however, implementation in software
// might be impractical."
FMF.setNoSignedZeros();
FMF.setNoNaNs();
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list