[PATCH] D12273: XFAIL bugpoint test on FreeBSD

Davide Italiano via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 24 03:44:04 PDT 2015


I don't know the rationale behind that (maybe it's just historical).
I think it makes more sense to look for clang first, but I'm
unfamiliar with the tool, so, I can't say anything more. I'll
withdrawn this review and try to propose a new patch.

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 2:38 PM, hfinkel at anl.gov via llvm-commits
<llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> hfinkel added a subscriber: hfinkel.
> hfinkel added a comment.
>
>> FreeBSD doesn't ship with gcc by default anymore, so this fails on a stock installation. I would like to mark this as XFAIL until a better solution is found, it generates noise.
>
>
> Is there any reason it should not be searching for 'clang' as a fallback (or even first)? As I recall, this is used mainly for linking.
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D12273
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits



-- 
Davide

"A mathematical theory is not to be considered complete until you have
made it so clear that you can explain it to the first man whom you
meet on the street." (D. Hilbert)


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list