[llvm] r245712 - Remove an unnecessary use of pointee types introduced in r194220

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-commits]

> On 2015-Aug-21, at 13:19, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 2015-Aug-21, at 10:37, David Blaikie via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Author: dblaikie
> > Date: Fri Aug 21 12:37:41 2015
> > New Revision: 245712
> >
> > URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject-3Frev-3D245712-26view-3Drev&d=BQIGaQ&c=eEvniauFctOgLOKGJOplqw&r=vftFLnHiqThJHdL0qZWd_Vo12qdMVOZDFnNVBhP9GKA&m=iFuuRajlg8CK1MZggc-FONg4WvEb9dEMjTcf2snpqjE&s=wcuxTBHNGsUIr6klIeRbCLTEYihMxpwXPg8mbp6uLCY&e=
> > Log:
> > Remove an unnecessary use of pointee types introduced in r194220
> >
> > David Majnemer (the original author) believes this to be an impossible
> > condition to reach anyway, and no test cases cover this so we'll go with
> > that.
> >
> > Modified:
> >    llvm/trunk/lib/IR/ConstantFold.cpp
> >
> > Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/IR/ConstantFold.cpp
> > URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_llvm_trunk_lib_IR_ConstantFold.cpp-3Frev-3D245712-26r1-3D245711-26r2-3D245712-26view-3Ddiff&d=BQIGaQ&c=eEvniauFctOgLOKGJOplqw&r=vftFLnHiqThJHdL0qZWd_Vo12qdMVOZDFnNVBhP9GKA&m=iFuuRajlg8CK1MZggc-FONg4WvEb9dEMjTcf2snpqjE&s=9qg0E1KghzGtl2ckpYoi8CzXjWBQthtOX6aXtRz5Jh8&e=
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/IR/ConstantFold.cpp (original)
> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/IR/ConstantFold.cpp Fri Aug 21 12:37:41 2015
> > @@ -1999,9 +1999,8 @@ static bool isInBoundsIndices(ArrayRef<I
> > /// \brief Test whether a given ConstantInt is in-range for a SequentialType.
> > static bool isIndexInRangeOfSequentialType(SequentialType *STy,
> >                                            const ConstantInt *CI) {
> > -  if (auto *PTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(STy))
> > -    // Only handle pointers to sized types, not pointers to functions.
> > -    return PTy->getElementType()->isSized();
> > +  if (isa<PointerType>(STy))
> > +    return true;
> 
> Worth a comment in the code?
> 
> Not sure if a comment would add value - the existing comment was just to describe a special case that didn't really exist/couldn't come up, so it seemed like without that the code would be fine as-is.
> 
> But sure, added in r245730

If you don't think it adds value, then feel free to revert; I was
just wondering if someone reading the code would ask the same
question you did originally (and worry that a case was missing).

> 
>    // And indicies are valid when indexing along a pointer
>     if (isa<PointerType>(STy))
>       return true;
> 
>  
> 
> >
> >   uint64_t NumElements = 0;
> >   // Determine the number of elements in our sequential type.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Dcommits&d=BQIGaQ&c=eEvniauFctOgLOKGJOplqw&r=vftFLnHiqThJHdL0qZWd_Vo12qdMVOZDFnNVBhP9GKA&m=iFuuRajlg8CK1MZggc-FONg4WvEb9dEMjTcf2snpqjE&s=CrF61doRZdRF05PkR5nctXedsIRfGq3hcZrivnRnW1A&e=