[PATCH] D11861: [IR] Add token types

[David Majnemer via llvm-commits]

majnemer added a comment.

Having support for #2 makes our job in WinEHPrepare not seriously harder, I'm OK with it.  Do any of the other stakeholders see any issues?

I'm a little confused though.  Won't the preparation logic color the shared region twice, causing it to be duplicated anyway?  If this is just a stepping stone to `cleanupcall` and no other stakeholder needs it, could we strengthen the restriction later?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861