[llvm] r243487 - [tests] Use llvm-readobj instead of macho-dump.

[Davide Italiano]

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Rafael Espíndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
>

Sure. The last beast to tackle is llvm-objdump. I'm cool with doing
the conversion but I wanted to hear your opinion. I think that
llvm-readobj is more of a tool for the final user so it makes sense to
continue on error rather than calling exit(1). What's your opinion,
and, if you know, what's the GNU behavior in this case?

Thanks,

--
Davide

> On Jul 28, 2015 6:00 PM, "Davide Italiano" <davide at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> Author: davide
>> Date: Tue Jul 28 16:58:08 2015
>> New Revision: 243487
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=243487&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [tests] Use llvm-readobj instead of macho-dump.
>>