[RFC] SortedVector ADT

[Krzysztof Parzyszek]

On 7/31/2015 11:48 AM, Puyan Lotfi wrote:
>
> Does this mean we should also try to remove any existing ADTs that
> aren't as compelling to have anymore?

I certainly wouldn't mind that, but I'm not the one who can make such a 
call.

If the standard containers are universally inadequate for whatever 
reasons, we should leave it to the C++ committee to address that, if 
not, we should use them. I understand that in specific cases we may need 
a structure that is as fast as possible, or as small as possible, but 
unless necessary, we should not reinvent the wheel.

-Krzysztof

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation