[llvm] r242834 - [SCEV][NFC] Fix a typo in a comment.

[Sanjoy Das]

Author: sanjoy
Date: Tue Jul 21 15:59:22 2015
New Revision: 242834

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=242834&view=rev
Log:
[SCEV][NFC] Fix a typo in a comment.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp?rev=242834&r1=242833&r2=242834&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp Tue Jul 21 15:59:22 2015
@@ -4744,12 +4744,12 @@ void ScalarEvolution::forgetValue(Value
 }
 
 /// getExact - Get the exact loop backedge taken count considering all loop
-/// exits. A computable result can only be return for loops with a single exit.
-/// Returning the minimum taken count among all exits is incorrect because one
-/// of the loop's exit limit's may have been skipped. HowFarToZero assumes that
-/// the limit of each loop test is never skipped. This is a valid assumption as
-/// long as the loop exits via that test. For precise results, it is the
-/// caller's responsibility to specify the relevant loop exit using
+/// exits. A computable result can only be returned for loops with a single
+/// exit.  Returning the minimum taken count among all exits is incorrect
+/// because one of the loop's exit limit's may have been skipped. HowFarToZero
+/// assumes that the limit of each loop test is never skipped. This is a valid
+/// assumption as long as the loop exits via that test. For precise results, it
+/// is the caller's responsibility to specify the relevant loop exit using
 /// getExact(ExitingBlock, SE).
 const SCEV *
 ScalarEvolution::BackedgeTakenInfo::getExact(ScalarEvolution *SE) const {