[llvm] r232769 - libLTO, llvm-lto, gold: Introduce flag for controlling optimization level.
Rafael EspĂndola
rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 11:53:56 PDT 2015
On 14 July 2015 at 08:15, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Do we need to handle -Os and -Oz better? Currently, these options will
> report a fatal error in the gold plugin.
What should it do?
All that the API has is a "unsigned optLevel". It is not clear if we
should have a size optimization option at this point. All cases that
need size optimization should already be converted to function
attributes, no?
Cheers,
Rafael
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list