[PATCH] D10857: Update documentation for unroll pragmas on loops with runtime trip counts
Mark Heffernan
meheff at google.com
Thu Jul 9 20:23:20 PDT 2015
meheff updated this revision to Diff 29425.
meheff added a comment.
Removing the llvm-specific flag sounds good to me. Updated in diff.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10857
Files:
docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
Index: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
===================================================================
--- docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
+++ docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
@@ -1991,10 +1991,10 @@
reduces the trip count.
If ``unroll(full)`` is specified the unroller will attempt to fully unroll the
-loop if the trip count is known at compile time. If the loop count is not known
-or the fully unrolled code size is greater than the limit specified by the
-`-pragma-unroll-threshold` command line option the loop will be partially
-unrolled subject to the same limit.
+loop if the trip count is known at compile time. If the fully unrolled code size
+is greater than an internal limit the loop will be partially unrolled up to this
+limit. If the loop count is not known at compile time the loop will not be
+unrolled.
.. code-block:: c++
@@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@
The unroll count can be specified explicitly with ``unroll_count(_value_)`` where
_value_ is a positive integer. If this value is greater than the trip count the
loop will be fully unrolled. Otherwise the loop is partially unrolled subject
-to the `-pragma-unroll-threshold` limit.
+to the same code size limit as with ``unroll(full)``.
.. code-block:: c++
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D10857.29425.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150710/45a19413/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list