[PATCH] MIR Serialization: Serialize immediate machine operands.

[Alex L]

Thanks,
I committed the APSInt change in r240436.

2015-06-19 14:48 GMT-07:00 Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com>:

>
> > On 2015-Jun-19, at 14:40, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2015-06-19 14:38 GMT-07:00 Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com
> >:
> >
> > > On 2015-Jun-19, at 13:35, Alex Lorenz <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi dexonsmith, bob.wilson, bogner,
> > >
> > > This patch is based on a previous serialization patch that serializes
> physical register operands (http://reviews.llvm.org/D10525).
> > >
> > > This patch serialized immediate machine operands by using integer
> literals.
> > >
> > > REPOSITORY
> > >  rL LLVM
> > >
> > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D10573
> > >
> > > Files:
> > >  lib/CodeGen/MIRParser/MILexer.cpp
> > >  lib/CodeGen/MIRParser/MILexer.h
> > >  lib/CodeGen/MIRParser/MIParser.cpp
> > >  lib/CodeGen/MIRPrinter.cpp
> > >  test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/immediate-operands.mir
> > >
> > > EMAIL PREFERENCES
> > >  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
> > > <D10573.28043.patch>
> >
> > > Index: lib/CodeGen/MIRParser/MILexer.cpp
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- lib/CodeGen/MIRParser/MILexer.cpp
> > > +++ lib/CodeGen/MIRParser/MILexer.cpp
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> > >
> > >    char peek() const { return isEOF() ? 0 : *Ptr; }
> > >
> > > +  char peekNext() const { return (Ptr + 1) >= End ? 0 : *(Ptr + 1); }
> >
> > This looks like undefined behaviour.  You can only compare two pointers
> > if they're within the same allocation.  It looks like `Ptr + 1` might go
> > past the end of the allocation here (already undefined behaviour IIRC,
> > even if you don't compare it to anything).
> >
> > Unless you can guarantee that it's valid to dereference `End` (and even
> > then, really, for clarity), rearrange the terms:
> >
> >     return End - Ptr <= 1 ? 0 : Ptr[1];
> >
> > (Also note the `Ptr[1]` -- IMO, brackets are easier to read than
> > dereference-and-parentheses.  Up to you though.)
> >
> > I wonder if this can just be merged with `peek()`?
> >
> >    char peek(unsigned I = 0) const { return End - Ptr <= I ? 0 : Ptr[I];
> }
> >
> > Then instead of calling `peekNext()`, call `peek(1)`.  I don't really
> > have an opinion here, it's just an idea; feel free to keep separate
> > functions.
> >
> > > +
> > >    void advance() { ++Ptr; }
> > >
> > >    StringRef remaining() const { return StringRef(Ptr, End - Ptr); }
> > > @@ -77,6 +79,32 @@
> > >    return C;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static APSInt toInteger(StringRef Str) {
> > > +  assert(!Str.empty() && "Integer literal string must not be empty");
> > > +  unsigned NumBits = ((Str.size() * 64) / 19) + 2;
> > > +  APInt Tmp(NumBits, Str, /*Radix=*/10);
> > > +  if (Str[0] == '-') {
> > > +    unsigned MinBits = Tmp.getMinSignedBits();
> > > +    if (MinBits > 0 && MinBits < NumBits)
> > > +      Tmp = Tmp.trunc(MinBits);
> > > +    return APSInt(Tmp, /*IsUnsigned=*/false);
> > > +  }
> > > +  unsigned ActiveBits = Tmp.getActiveBits();
> > > +  if (ActiveBits > 0 && ActiveBits < NumBits)
> > > +    Tmp = Tmp.trunc(ActiveBits);
> > > +  return APSInt(Tmp, /*IsUnsigned=*/true);
> > > +}
> >
> > Is this copied directly from `LLLexer`?  If so, is there some way of
> > sharing the logic?  (Should it go in `APSInt.h`?)
> >
> > Yeah, it's a copy. It would make sense to share this code indeed, I will
> create a patch.
> >
> > Alex.
>
> I suspect it'll be fairly obvious.  No need to send a patch unless you
> want help with naming, but I suspect you just want:
>
>     explicit APSInt(StringRef S);
>
> With that exposed/tested/committed ahead of time, this patch LGTM (once
> you fix the undefined behaviour).
>
> >
> >
> > If not, what's different?
> >
> > > +
> > > +static Cursor lexIntegerLiteral(Cursor C, MIToken &Token) {
> > > +  auto Range = C;
> > > +  C.advance();
> > > +  while (isdigit(C.peek()))
> > > +    C.advance();
> > > +  StringRef StrVal = Range.upto(C);
> > > +  Token = MIToken(MIToken::IntegerLiteral, StrVal, toInteger(StrVal));
> > > +  return C;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static MIToken::TokenKind symbolToken(char C) {
> > >    switch (C) {
> > >    case ',':
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150623/6ff424ae/attachment.html>