[llvm] r240039 - [CallGraph] Teach the CallGraph about non-leaf intrinsics.

Sanjoy Das sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com
Fri Jun 19 13:28:20 PDT 2015


I think -print-callgraph (all print functions, actually) should be
deterministic within reason.  I'll put up a review fixing this
shortly.


On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
> Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> writes:
>> Author: sanjoy
>> Date: Thu Jun 18 14:28:26 2015
>> New Revision: 240039
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240039&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [CallGraph] Teach the CallGraph about non-leaf intrinsics.
>>
>> Summary:
>> Currently intrinsics don't affect the creation of the call graph.
>> This is not accurate with respect to statepoint and patchpoint
>> intrinsics -- these do call (or invoke) LLVM level functions.
>>
>> This change fixes this inconsistency by adding a call to the external
>> node for call sites that call these non-leaf intrinsics.  This coupled
>> with the fact that these intrinsics also escape the function pointer
>> they call gives us a conservatively correct call graph.
>>
>> Reviewers: reames, chandlerc, atrick, pgavlin
>>
>> Subscribers: llvm-commits
>>
>> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10526
>>
>> Added:
>>     llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/CallGraph/non-leaf-intrinsics.ll
>> Modified:
>>     llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/CallGraph.h
>>     llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h
>>     llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraph.cpp
>>     llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraphSCCPass.cpp
>>     llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Function.cpp
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/CallGraph.h
>> URL:
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/CallGraph.h?rev=240039&r1=240038&r2=240039&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/CallGraph.h (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/CallGraph.h Thu Jun 18 14:28:26 2015
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>>  #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
>>  #include "llvm/IR/CallSite.h"
>>  #include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
>> +#include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h"
>>  #include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h"
>>  #include "llvm/Pass.h"
>>  #include <map>
>> @@ -229,7 +230,8 @@ public:
>>    /// \brief Adds a function to the list of functions called by this one.
>>    void addCalledFunction(CallSite CS, CallGraphNode *M) {
>>      assert(!CS.getInstruction() || !CS.getCalledFunction() ||
>> -           !CS.getCalledFunction()->isIntrinsic());
>> +           !CS.getCalledFunction()->isIntrinsic() ||
>> +           !Intrinsic::isLeaf(CS.getCalledFunction()->getIntrinsicID()));
>>      CalledFunctions.emplace_back(CS.getInstruction(), M);
>>      M->AddRef();
>>    }
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h?rev=240039&r1=240038&r2=240039&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h Thu Jun 18 14:28:26 2015
>> @@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ namespace Intrinsic {
>>    /// Returns true if the intrinsic can be overloaded.
>>    bool isOverloaded(ID id);
>>
>> +  /// Returns true if the intrinsic is a leaf, i.e. it does not make any calls
>> +  /// itself.  Most intrinsics are leafs, the exceptions being the patchpoint
>> +  /// and statepoint intrinsics. These call (or invoke) their "target" argument.
>> +  bool isLeaf(ID id);
>> +
>>    /// Return the attributes for an intrinsic.
>>    AttributeSet getAttributes(LLVMContext &C, ID id);
>>
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraph.cpp
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraph.cpp?rev=240039&r1=240038&r2=240039&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraph.cpp (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraph.cpp Thu Jun 18 14:28:26 2015
>> @@ -79,8 +79,10 @@ void CallGraph::addToCallGraph(Function
>>        CallSite CS(cast<Value>(II));
>>        if (CS) {
>>          const Function *Callee = CS.getCalledFunction();
>> -        if (!Callee)
>> +        if (!Callee || !Intrinsic::isLeaf(Callee->getIntrinsicID()))
>>            // Indirect calls of intrinsics are not allowed so no need to check.
>> +          // We can be more precise here by using TargetArg returned by
>> +          // Intrinsic::isLeaf.
>>            Node->addCalledFunction(CS, CallsExternalNode);
>>          else if (!Callee->isIntrinsic())
>>            Node->addCalledFunction(CS, getOrInsertFunction(Callee));
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraphSCCPass.cpp
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraphSCCPass.cpp?rev=240039&r1=240038&r2=240039&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraphSCCPass.cpp (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraphSCCPass.cpp Thu Jun 18 14:28:26 2015
>> @@ -217,8 +217,10 @@ bool CGPassManager::RefreshCallGraph(Cal
>>            // another value. This can happen when constant folding happens
>>            // of well known functions etc.
>>            !CallSite(I->first) ||
>> -           (CallSite(I->first).getCalledFunction() &&
>> -            CallSite(I->first).getCalledFunction()->isIntrinsic())) {
>> +          (CallSite(I->first).getCalledFunction() &&
>> +           CallSite(I->first).getCalledFunction()->isIntrinsic() &&
>> +           Intrinsic::isLeaf(
>> +               CallSite(I->first).getCalledFunction()->getIntrinsicID()))) {
>>          assert(!CheckingMode &&
>>                 "CallGraphSCCPass did not update the CallGraph correctly!");
>>
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Function.cpp
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Function.cpp?rev=240039&r1=240038&r2=240039&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Function.cpp (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Function.cpp Thu Jun 18 14:28:26 2015
>> @@ -846,6 +846,18 @@ bool Intrinsic::isOverloaded(ID id) {
>>  #undef GET_INTRINSIC_OVERLOAD_TABLE
>>  }
>>
>> +bool Intrinsic::isLeaf(ID id) {
>> +  switch (id) {
>> +  default:
>> +    return true;
>> +
>> +  case Intrinsic::experimental_gc_statepoint:
>> +  case Intrinsic::experimental_patchpoint_void:
>> +  case Intrinsic::experimental_patchpoint_i64:
>> +    return false;
>> +  }
>> +}
>> +
>>  /// This defines the "Intrinsic::getAttributes(ID id)" method.
>>  #define GET_INTRINSIC_ATTRIBUTES
>>  #include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.gen"
>>
>> Added: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/CallGraph/non-leaf-intrinsics.ll
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/CallGraph/non-leaf-intrinsics.ll?rev=240039&view=auto
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/CallGraph/non-leaf-intrinsics.ll (added)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/CallGraph/non-leaf-intrinsics.ll Thu Jun 18 14:28:26 2015
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +; RUN: opt -S -print-callgraph -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
>> +
>> +declare void @llvm.experimental.patchpoint.void(i64, i32, i8*, i32, ...)
>> +declare i32 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)
>> +
>> +define private void @f() {
>> +  ret void
>> +}
>> +
>> +define void @calls_statepoint(i8 addrspace(1)* %arg) gc "statepoint-example" {
>> +entry:
>> +  %cast = bitcast i8 addrspace(1)* %arg to i64 addrspace(1)*
>> +  %safepoint_token = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @f, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 10, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %arg, i64 addrspace(1)* %cast, i8 addrspace(1)* %arg, i8 addrspace(1)* %arg)
>> +  ret void
>> +}
>> +
>> +define void @calls_patchpoint() {
>> +entry:
>> +  %c = bitcast void()* @f to i8*
>> +  tail call void (i64, i32, i8*, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.patchpoint.void(i64 1, i32 15, i8* %c, i32 0, i16 65535, i16 -1, i32 65536, i32 2000000000, i32 2147483647, i32 -1, i32 4294967295, i32 4294967296, i64 2147483648, i64 4294967295, i64 4294967296, i64 -1)
>> +  ret void
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +; CHECK: Call graph node <<null function>>
>> +; CHECK:  CS<0x0> calls function 'f'
>> +
>> +; CHECK: Call graph node for function: 'calls_statepoint'
>> +; CHECK-NEXT:  CS<[[addr_0:[^>]+]]> calls external node
>> +
>> +; CHECK: Call graph node for function: 'calls_patchpoint'
>> +; CHECK-NEXT:  CS<[[addr_1:[^>]+]]> calls external node
>
> The order that these call graph nodes are emitted seems to change when I
> run the tests under asan+ubsan. That is, the test outputs:
>
>   Call graph node <<null function>><<0x6040000041d0>>  #uses=0
>     CS<0x0> calls function 'llvm.experimental.patchpoint.void'
>     CS<0x0> calls function 'llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf'
>     CS<0x0> calls function 'f'
>     CS<0x0> calls function 'calls_statepoint'
>     CS<0x0> calls function 'calls_patchpoint'
>
>   Call graph node for function: 'calls_patchpoint'<<0x604000003f10>>  #uses=1
>     CS<0x61500000f218> calls external node
>
>   Call graph node for function: 'calls_statepoint'<<0x604000003f90>>  #uses=1
>     CS<0x61500000f498> calls external node
>
> Does it make sense loosen this test to accept the output in either
> order, or does this look like an issue with -print-callgraph?
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list