[PATCH] [PowerPC]Adapt fast stack unwinding to work for Power.

[Bill Schmidt]

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D9259#188686, @seurer wrote:

> We seem to be kind of stuck here.  Either we remove the inlined function leaving the function that started the unwinding (free and etc.) as the top frame in the stack which was my previous solution or we don't remove it which is this solution.  Which should we go for?


I agree with Alexey.  I feel that your earlier solution was correct.  That solution is correct for PowerPC and does not harm other architectures.  At this point it would be nice if we could get a resolution on this issue -- it's been  held up for a very long time.

Thanks,
Bill


http://reviews.llvm.org/D9259

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/