[llvm] r239601 - [ASan] format AddressSanitizer.cpp with `clang-format -style=Google`, NFC
Alexander Potapenko
glider at google.com
Fri Jun 12 08:46:49 PDT 2015
I've asked Dima and he told me we've used Google style previously,
this was also my impression.
I think I've tried the default style and the diff was larger.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why don't we use LLVM style instead?
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Author: glider
>> Date: Fri Jun 12 06:27:06 2015
>> New Revision: 239601
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=239601&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [ASan] format AddressSanitizer.cpp with `clang-format -style=Google`, NFC
>>
>> Modified:
>> llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
>> URL:
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp?rev=239601&r1=239600&r2=239601&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
>> (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp Fri Jun
>> 12 06:27:06 2015
>> @@ -106,10 +106,8 @@ static const char *const kAsanUnpoisonSt
>> static const char *const kAsanOptionDetectUAR =
>> "__asan_option_detect_stack_use_after_return";
>>
>> -static const char *const kAsanAllocaPoison =
>> - "__asan_alloca_poison";
>> -static const char *const kAsanAllocasUnpoison =
>> - "__asan_allocas_unpoison";
>> +static const char *const kAsanAllocaPoison = "__asan_alloca_poison";
>> +static const char *const kAsanAllocasUnpoison =
>> "__asan_allocas_unpoison";
>>
>> // Accesses sizes are powers of two: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16.
>> static const size_t kNumberOfAccessSizes = 5;
>> @@ -410,8 +408,7 @@ struct AddressSanitizer : public Functio
>> /// If it is an interesting memory access, return the PointerOperand
>> /// and set IsWrite/Alignment. Otherwise return nullptr.
>> Value *isInterestingMemoryAccess(Instruction *I, bool *IsWrite,
>> - uint64_t *TypeSize,
>> - unsigned *Alignment);
>> + uint64_t *TypeSize, unsigned
>> *Alignment);
>> void instrumentMop(ObjectSizeOffsetVisitor &ObjSizeVis, Instruction *I,
>> bool UseCalls, const DataLayout &DL);
>> void instrumentPointerComparisonOrSubtraction(Instruction *I);
>> @@ -588,7 +585,7 @@ struct FunctionStackPoisoner : public In
>> Value *SavedStack) {
>> IRBuilder<> IRB(InstBefore);
>> IRB.CreateCall(AsanAllocasUnpoisonFunc,
>> - {IRB.CreateLoad(DynamicAllocaLayout),
>> + {IRB.CreateLoad(DynamicAllocaLayout),
>> IRB.CreatePtrToInt(SavedStack, IntptrTy)});
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1706,8 +1703,7 @@ void FunctionStackPoisoner::poisonStack(
>> if (ClInstrumentAllocas && DynamicAllocaVec.size() > 0) {
>> // Handle dynamic allocas.
>> createDynamicAllocasInitStorage();
>> - for (auto &AI : DynamicAllocaVec)
>> - handleDynamicAllocaCall(AI);
>> + for (auto &AI : DynamicAllocaVec) handleDynamicAllocaCall(AI);
>>
>> unpoisonDynamicAllocas();
>> }
>> @@ -1901,9 +1897,9 @@ void FunctionStackPoisoner::poisonAlloca
>> // For now just insert the call to ASan runtime.
>> Value *AddrArg = IRB.CreatePointerCast(V, IntptrTy);
>> Value *SizeArg = ConstantInt::get(IntptrTy, Size);
>> - IRB.CreateCall(DoPoison ? AsanPoisonStackMemoryFunc
>> - : AsanUnpoisonStackMemoryFunc,
>> - {AddrArg, SizeArg});
>> + IRB.CreateCall(
>> + DoPoison ? AsanPoisonStackMemoryFunc : AsanUnpoisonStackMemoryFunc,
>> + {AddrArg, SizeArg});
>> }
>>
>> // Handling llvm.lifetime intrinsics for a given %alloca:
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Samsonov
> vonosmas at gmail.com
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Germany GmbH
Dienerstraße 12
80331 München
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list