[llvm] r239162 - [bpf] rename triple names bpf_be -> bpfeb

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith]

> On 2015-Jun-05, at 10:18, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>> If we're going to change suffixes to try to pick ones which make sense to be
>> consistent with going forward, I would prefer we pick ones which actually
>> make sense.
> 
> imo bpf_be and bpf_le were more readable.
> 
> ... let the bikeshedding  continue... :)

I know nothing of the history here (and I'm terrible at naming things)
but if it turns out there isn't really a proper precedent, I agree
that the _{b,l}e names are more obvious and readable.