[PATCH] CodeGen: Use mop_iterator instead of MIOperands/ConstMIOperands
Quentin Colombet
qcolombet at apple.com
Fri May 22 10:47:08 PDT 2015
Hi Matthias,
Although both iterators have the same capabilities, I found it convenient to use one or another depending on the context.
That being said, I do not feel strongly about deprecating one, if Andy agrees.
Anyhow, some of the for range based loops looks good, the other ones not such much (that's why I am a bit reluctant for the whole change).
Cheers,
-Quentin
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/EarlyIfConversion.cpp:229
@@ -228,3 +228,3 @@
// Check for any dependencies on Head instructions.
- for (MIOperands MO(I); MO.isValid(); ++MO) {
- if (MO->isRegMask()) {
+ for (const MachineOperand MO : I->operands()) {
+ if (MO.isRegMask()) {
----------------
While you are here, maybe we can use a reference for this one.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9932
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list