[llvm] r237284 - [LoopIdiomRecognize] Use auto + range-based loop. NFC intended.
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
dexonsmith at apple.com
Wed May 13 21:10:23 PDT 2015
> On 2015 May 13, at 12:51, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Author: davide
> Date: Wed May 13 14:51:21 2015
> New Revision: 237284
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=237284&view=rev
> Log:
> [LoopIdiomRecognize] Use auto + range-based loop. NFC intended.
>
>
> Modified:
> llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp?rev=237284&r1=237283&r2=237284&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp Wed May 13 14:51:21 2015
> @@ -639,13 +639,12 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::runOnCountableL
>
> bool MadeChange = false;
> // Scan all the blocks in the loop that are not in subloops.
> - for (Loop::block_iterator BI = CurLoop->block_begin(),
> - E = CurLoop->block_end(); BI != E; ++BI) {
> + for (auto BB : CurLoop->getBlocks()) {
At a quick glance this looks like a copy, since it's not obvious
that we're iterating through pointers. Please either use:
for (BasicBlock *BB : ...)
or
for (auto *BB : ...)
> // Ignore blocks in subloops.
> - if (LI.getLoopFor(*BI) != CurLoop)
> + if (LI.getLoopFor(BB) != CurLoop)
> continue;
>
> - MadeChange |= runOnLoopBlock(*BI, BECount, ExitBlocks);
> + MadeChange |= runOnLoopBlock(BB, BECount, ExitBlocks);
> }
> return MadeChange;
> }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list