[llvm] r237175 - [X86] Always return the sret parameter in eax/rax, even on 32-bit

Reid Kleckner reid at kleckner.net
Tue May 12 13:56:32 PDT 2015


Author: rnk
Date: Tue May 12 15:56:32 2015
New Revision: 237175

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=237175&view=rev
Log:
[X86] Always return the sret parameter in eax/rax, even on 32-bit

Summary:
This rule was always in the old SysV i386 ABI docs and the new ones that
H.J. Lu has put together, but we never noticed:

  EAX   scratch register; also used to return integer and pointer values
        from functions; also stores the address of a returned struct or union

Fixes PR23491.

Reviewers: majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9715

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cmovcmov.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/sret-implicit.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp?rev=237175&r1=237174&r2=237175&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp Tue May 12 15:56:32 2015
@@ -2000,9 +2000,8 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerReturn(SDValue C
     RetOps.push_back(DAG.getRegister(VA.getLocReg(), VA.getLocVT()));
   }
 
-  // The x86-64 ABIs require that for returning structs by value we copy
+  // All x86 ABIs require that for returning structs by value we copy
   // the sret argument into %rax/%eax (depending on ABI) for the return.
-  // Win32 requires us to put the sret argument to %eax as well.
   // We saved the argument into a virtual register in the entry block,
   // so now we copy the value out and into %rax/%eax.
   //
@@ -2011,8 +2010,6 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerReturn(SDValue C
   // false, then an sret argument may be implicitly inserted in the SelDAG. In
   // either case FuncInfo->setSRetReturnReg() will have been called.
   if (unsigned SRetReg = FuncInfo->getSRetReturnReg()) {
-    assert((Subtarget->is64Bit() || Subtarget->isTargetKnownWindowsMSVC()) &&
-           "No need for an sret register");
     SDValue Val = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, dl, SRetReg, getPointerTy());
 
     unsigned RetValReg
@@ -2434,24 +2431,21 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments(
     InVals.push_back(ArgValue);
   }
 
-  if (Subtarget->is64Bit() || Subtarget->isTargetKnownWindowsMSVC()) {
-    for (unsigned i = 0, e = ArgLocs.size(); i != e; ++i) {
-      // The x86-64 ABIs require that for returning structs by value we copy
-      // the sret argument into %rax/%eax (depending on ABI) for the return.
-      // Win32 requires us to put the sret argument to %eax as well.
-      // Save the argument into a virtual register so that we can access it
-      // from the return points.
-      if (Ins[i].Flags.isSRet()) {
-        unsigned Reg = FuncInfo->getSRetReturnReg();
-        if (!Reg) {
-          MVT PtrTy = getPointerTy();
-          Reg = MF.getRegInfo().createVirtualRegister(getRegClassFor(PtrTy));
-          FuncInfo->setSRetReturnReg(Reg);
-        }
-        SDValue Copy = DAG.getCopyToReg(DAG.getEntryNode(), dl, Reg, InVals[i]);
-        Chain = DAG.getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, dl, MVT::Other, Copy, Chain);
-        break;
+  for (unsigned i = 0, e = ArgLocs.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+    // All x86 ABIs require that for returning structs by value we copy the
+    // sret argument into %rax/%eax (depending on ABI) for the return. Save
+    // the argument into a virtual register so that we can access it from the
+    // return points.
+    if (Ins[i].Flags.isSRet()) {
+      unsigned Reg = FuncInfo->getSRetReturnReg();
+      if (!Reg) {
+        MVT PtrTy = getPointerTy();
+        Reg = MF.getRegInfo().createVirtualRegister(getRegClassFor(PtrTy));
+        FuncInfo->setSRetReturnReg(Reg);
       }
+      SDValue Copy = DAG.getCopyToReg(DAG.getEntryNode(), dl, Reg, InVals[i]);
+      Chain = DAG.getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, dl, MVT::Other, Copy, Chain);
+      break;
     }
   }
 

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cmovcmov.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cmovcmov.ll?rev=237175&r1=237174&r2=237175&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cmovcmov.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/cmovcmov.ll Tue May 12 15:56:32 2015
@@ -143,19 +143,19 @@ entry:
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   jp  [[TBB]]
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  24(%esp), %eax
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT: [[TBB]]:
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  (%eax), %eax
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  44(%esp), %ecx
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  (%eax), %ecx
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  44(%esp), %edx
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   jne  [[TBB:.LBB[0-9_]+]]
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   jp  [[TBB]]
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  28(%esp), %ecx
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  28(%esp), %edx
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT: [[TBB]]:
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  (%ecx), %ecx
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  12(%esp), %eax
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  (%edx), %edx
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  48(%esp), %esi
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   jne  [[TBB:.LBB[0-9_]+]]
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   jp  [[TBB]]
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  32(%esp), %esi
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT: [[TBB]]:
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  12(%esp), %edx
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  (%esi), %esi
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  52(%esp), %edi
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   jne  [[TBB:.LBB[0-9_]+]]
@@ -163,10 +163,10 @@ entry:
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   leal  36(%esp), %edi
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT: [[TBB]]:
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  (%edi), %edi
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %edi, 12(%edx)
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %esi, 8(%edx)
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %ecx, 4(%edx)
-; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %eax, (%edx)
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %edi, 12(%eax)
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %esi, 8(%eax)
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %edx, 4(%eax)
+; NOCMOV-NEXT:   movl  %ecx, (%eax)
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   popl  %esi
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   popl  %edi
 ; NOCMOV-NEXT:   retl  $4

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/sret-implicit.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/sret-implicit.ll?rev=237175&r1=237174&r2=237175&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/sret-implicit.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/sret-implicit.ll Tue May 12 15:56:32 2015
@@ -1,12 +1,34 @@
-; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin8 < %s | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linux < %s | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin8 -terminal-rule < %s | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linux -terminal-rule < %s | FileCheck %s
-
-; CHECK-LABEL: return32
-; CHECK-DAG: movq	$0, (%rdi)
-; CHECK-DAG: movq	%rdi, %rax
-; CHECK: retq
-define i256 @return32() {
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin8 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linux < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=i686-pc-linux < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X86
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin8 -terminal-rule < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linux -terminal-rule < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64
+
+define void @sret_void(i32* sret %p) {
+  store i32 0, i32* %p
+  ret void
+}
+
+; X64-LABEL: sret_void
+; X64-DAG: movl $0, (%rdi)
+; X64-DAG: movq %rdi, %rax
+; X64: retq
+
+; X86-LABEL: sret_void
+; X86: movl 4(%esp), %eax
+; X86: movl $0, (%eax)
+; X86: retl
+
+define i256 @sret_demoted() {
   ret i256 0
 }
+
+; X64-LABEL: sret_demoted
+; X64-DAG: movq $0, (%rdi)
+; X64-DAG: movq %rdi, %rax
+; X64: retq
+
+; X86-LABEL: sret_demoted
+; X86: movl 4(%esp), %eax
+; X86: movl $0, (%eax)
+; X86: retl





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list