[zorg] r214540 - Fixed mergefunc builder configure; added lldb builder for FreeBSD.

[Galina Kistanova]

Hello everyone,

I'm not sure I follow the discussion.

Which builder are we talking about? Is it lldb-x86_64-freebsd?

If it is, it is set to send e-mail notifications only when builder's status
goes from green to red, or after the slave goes down and then back (i.e.
every time I restart the master). IRC notifications get sent on every
status change (i.e. green to red, or red to green).

There were 3 failure e-mail notifications related to this particular
builder during the last month. The last notification looks valid, since the
build went from green to red (
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/5589 vs.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/5588).

> lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10
<http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10> does not send
email or IRC.

This is not quite accurate. This particular builder sent 10 notifications
during the last month.

Or we are talking about all the builders in the whole "lldb" category? If
so, let's agree on how it should behave from the notification perspective,
and I'll configure it to do so.

In general, any unreliable builder should be in the "experimental"
category. These are not sending notifications at all.

Thanks

Galina


On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Rick Foos <rfoos at codeaurora.org> wrote:

>  The windows bots are compile only at this time. Most of the tests fail
> there.
>
> The windows LLDB bots need to remain active to catch build breaks.
>
> I would agree that email notifications and IRC should be disabled until
> the bot is green most of the time. lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10
> <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10> does not
> send email or IRC.
>
> I thought the failing LLDB bots were going to be turned off by Dmitri?
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
> On 05/11/2015 05:18 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11 May 2015 at 16:51, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > The buildbot could be configured to send you email when it fails without
>> > sending blame email to everyone who committed the change. This might be
>> the
>> > right state until the flakiness is alleviated or fixed.
>> >
>> > (it's still not great for the waterfall view of the buildbots ot have
>> that
>> > sort of thing - I'm not sure if we already have a grouping for buildbots
>> > that are flaky/unreliable (if not, we should create one & pretty much
>> put
>> > all but a handful of the buildbots in there...)
>>
>> I think this would be much better than doing something to the
>> FreeBSD/LLDB bot specifically, and ideally we could control blame
>> email for that entire group.  For LLDB only the Windows bots are
>> consistently green (although they have a large number of tests that
>> are skipped because of a lack of infrastructure there).
>>
>
> Whichever suits you to do. (I can give some vague pointers, but it's been
> years since I've poked at the buildbot configs - not sure if the grouping
> gives us any group control over the email config, for example) Just want to
> make sure we're not spamming developers with unactionable email.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing listllvm-commits at cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
> --
> Rick Foos
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150511/e62ab88a/attachment.html>