[PATCH] llvm-ar shouldn't need targets

[Pete Cooper]

Sounds like llvm-ar needs most of the same pieces of the target as llvm-mc.  Would it be worth making the same change as r235324?

Pete
> On Apr 30, 2015, at 1:34 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 30 April 2015 at 16:02, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:
>> Ugh... I had completely overlooked generating symbol tables for assembly files. The layering oddness here kinda hurts my head and feels a bit off, but I get it.
> 
> It is inline assembly in bitcode files, but yes, it hurts :-(
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits