Disable arm-gepopt by default
Tim Northover
t.p.northover at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 20:40:30 PDT 2015
On 20 April 2015 at 20:34, Gerolf Hoflehner <ghoflehner at apple.com> wrote:
> It shouldn’t come across as ‘extreme’.
The "extreme" part wasn't so much the tentative disabling as "Could
you and/or Hao take this on after the code is disabled/backed out?". I
realise it wasn't an ultimatum, but it could very easily turn into
"we're washing our hands of this", which I'd object to.
I assume the pass was committed with some kind of metric that it
improved, and now we have a counter-example. It's down to everyone to
decide what the best way to proceed is.
Cheers.
Tim.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list