[PATCH] [Unfinished] Use modulo semantic to generate non-wrap assumptions
Tobias Grosser
tobias at grosser.es
Mon Apr 20 05:25:12 PDT 2015
On 04/20/2015 12:43 AM, Johannes Doerfert wrote:
> Some comments, new version is coming soon.
Good.
> grosser wrote:
>> Why do you call this function 'NonWrap'? Is the point of this function not to add the integer wrapping? Could a name like 'addIntegerWrapping()' be a better fit?
> is
> addModuloSemantic
> fine?
Sounds good.
Best,
Tobias
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list