[llvm] r234979 - Re-apply r234898 and fix tests.

Daniel Jasper djasper at google.com
Tue Apr 14 23:24:07 PDT 2015


Author: djasper
Date: Wed Apr 15 01:24:07 2015
New Revision: 234979

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=234979&view=rev
Log:
Re-apply r234898 and fix tests.

This commit makes LLVM not estimate branch probabilities when doing a
single bit bitmask tests.

The code that originally made me discover this is:

  if ((a & 0x1) == 0x1) {
    ..
  }

In this case we don't actually have any branch probability information
and should not assume to have any. LLVM transforms this into:

  %and = and i32 %a, 1
  %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and, 0

So, in this case, the result of a bitwise and is compared against 0,
but nevertheless, we should not assume to have probability
information.

CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll started failing because the
changed probabilities changed the results of
ARMBaseInstrInfo::isProfitableToIfCvt() and led to an Ifcvt of the
diamond in the test. AFAICT, the test was never meant to test this and
thus changing the test input slightly to not change the probabilities
seems like the best way to preserve the meaning of the test.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo/basic.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-call-tailcalls.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll
    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/octeon.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp?rev=234979&r1=234978&r2=234979&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp Wed Apr 15 01:24:07 2015
@@ -379,6 +379,14 @@ bool BranchProbabilityInfo::calcZeroHeur
   if (!CV)
     return false;
 
+  // If the LHS is the result of AND'ing a value with a single bit bitmask,
+  // we don't have information about probabilities.
+  if (Instruction *LHS = dyn_cast<Instruction>(CI->getOperand(0)))
+    if (LHS->getOpcode() == Instruction::And)
+      if (ConstantInt *AndRHS = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHS->getOperand(1)))
+        if (AndRHS->getUniqueInteger().isPowerOf2())
+          return false;
+
   bool isProb;
   if (CV->isZero()) {
     switch (CI->getPredicate()) {

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo/basic.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo/basic.ll?rev=234979&r1=234978&r2=234979&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo/basic.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo/basic.ll Wed Apr 15 01:24:07 2015
@@ -212,3 +212,31 @@ exit:
   ret i32 %result
 }
 
+define i32 @zero3(i32 %i, i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+; CHECK: Printing analysis {{.*}} for function 'zero3'
+entry:
+; AND'ing with a single bit bitmask essentially leads to a bool comparison,
+; meaning we don't have probability information.
+  %and = and i32 %i, 2
+  %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and, 0
+  br i1 %tobool, label %then, label %else
+; CHECK: edge entry -> then probability is 16 / 32
+; CHECK: edge entry -> else probability is 16 / 32
+
+then:
+; AND'ing with other bitmask might be something else, so we still assume the
+; usual probabilities.
+  %and2 = and i32 %i, 5
+  %tobool2 = icmp eq i32 %and2, 0
+  br i1 %tobool2, label %else, label %exit
+; CHECK: edge then -> else probability is 12 / 32
+; CHECK: edge then -> exit probability is 20 / 32
+
+else:
+  br label %exit
+
+exit:
+  %result = phi i32 [ %a, %then ], [ %b, %else ]
+  ret i32 %result
+}
+

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-call-tailcalls.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-call-tailcalls.ll?rev=234979&r1=234978&r2=234979&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-call-tailcalls.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-call-tailcalls.ll Wed Apr 15 01:24:07 2015
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ bb:
 
 define i32 @t8(i32 %x) nounwind ssp {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: t8:
+; CHECK: b	_c
 ; CHECK: b	_a
 ; CHECK: b	_b
-; CHECK: b	_c
   %and = and i32 %x, 1
   %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and, 0
   br i1 %tobool, label %if.end, label %if.then

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll?rev=234979&r1=234978&r2=234979&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll Wed Apr 15 01:24:07 2015
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ define <16 x i8> @multiselect(i32 %avail
 entry:
   %vld1 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v16i8(i8* %foo, i32 1)
   %vld2 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v16i8(i8* %bar, i32 1)
-  %and = and i32 %avail, 1
+  %and = and i32 %avail, 3
   %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and, 0
   %retv = select i1 %tobool, <16 x i8> %vld1, <16 x i8> %vld2
   ret <16 x i8> %retv

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/octeon.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/octeon.ll?rev=234979&r1=234978&r2=234979&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/octeon.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Mips/octeon.ll Wed Apr 15 01:24:07 2015
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ entry:
 ; ALL-LABEL: bbit0:
 ; OCTEON: bbit0   $4, 3, $[[BB0:BB[0-9_]+]]
 ; MIPS64: andi  $[[T0:[0-9]+]], $4, 8
-; MIPS64: beqz  $[[T0]], $[[BB0:BB[0-9_]+]]
+; MIPS64: bnez  $[[T0]], $[[BB0:BB[0-9_]+]]
   %bit = and i64 %a, 8
   %res = icmp eq i64 %bit, 0
   br i1 %res, label %endif, label %if
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ entry:
 ; MIPS64: daddiu  $[[T0:[0-9]+]], $zero, 1
 ; MIPS64: dsll    $[[T1:[0-9]+]], $[[T0]], 35
 ; MIPS64: and     $[[T2:[0-9]+]], $4, $[[T1]]
-; MIPS64: beqz    $[[T2]], $[[BB0:BB[0-9_]+]]
+; MIPS64: bnez    $[[T2]], $[[BB0:BB[0-9_]+]]
   %bit = and i64 %a, 34359738368
   %res = icmp eq i64 %bit, 0
   br i1 %res, label %endif, label %if





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list