[llvm] r232790 - Verifier: Remove the separate DebugInfoVerifier class

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith]

Author: dexonsmith
Date: Thu Mar 19 19:48:23 2015
New Revision: 232790

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=232790&view=rev
Log:
Verifier: Remove the separate DebugInfoVerifier class

Remove the separate `DebugInfoVerifier` class, as a partial step toward
better integrating debug info verification with the `Verifier`.

Right now, verification of debug info is kind of a mess.

  - There are `DIDescriptor::Verify()` checks live in `DebugInfo.cpp`.
    These return `bool`, and there's no way to see (except by opening a
    debugger) why they fail.
  - We rely on `DebugInfoFinder` to traverse the debug info graph and
    dig up nodes.  However, the regular `Verifier` visits many of these
    nodes when it calls into debug info intrinsic operands.  Visiting
    twice and running different checks is kind of absurd.
  - Moreover, `DebugInfoFinder` asserts on failed type resolution -- the
    verifier should never assert!

By integrating the two verifiers, I'm aiming at solving these problems
(work to be done, obviously).  Verification can be localized to the
`Verifier`; we can use a naive `MDNode` operand traversal to find all
the nodes; we can verify type references instead of asserting on
failure.

There are `assert()`s sprinkled throughout the optimizer and dwarf
backend on `DIDescriptor::Verify()` checks.  This is a hangover from
when the debug info verifier was off, so I plan to remove them as I go
(once I confirm that the checks are done at verification time).

Note: to keep the behaviour of only running the debug info verifier when
-verify succeeds, I've added an `EverBroken` flag.  Once the
`DebugInfoFinder` assertions are gone and the two traversals have been
merged, I expect to be able to remove this.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp?rev=232790&r1=232789&r2=232790&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp Thu Mar 19 19:48:23 2015
@@ -87,9 +87,10 @@ struct VerifierSupport {
 
   /// \brief Track the brokenness of the module while recursively visiting.
   bool Broken;
+  bool EverBroken;
 
   explicit VerifierSupport(raw_ostream &OS)
-      : OS(OS), M(nullptr), Broken(false) {}
+      : OS(OS), M(nullptr), Broken(false), EverBroken(false) {}
 
 private:
   void Write(const Value *V) {
@@ -137,7 +138,7 @@ public:
   /// something is not correct.
   void CheckFailed(const Twine &Message) {
     OS << Message << '\n';
-    Broken = true;
+    EverBroken = Broken = true;
   }
 
   /// \brief A check failed (with values to print).
@@ -260,6 +261,9 @@ public:
     visitModuleFlags(M);
     visitModuleIdents(M);
 
+    // Verify debug info last.
+    verifyDebugInfo();
+
     return !Broken;
   }
 
@@ -358,18 +362,8 @@ private:
   void VerifyConstantExprBitcastType(const ConstantExpr *CE);
   void VerifyStatepoint(ImmutableCallSite CS);
   void verifyFrameRecoverIndices();
-};
-class DebugInfoVerifier : public VerifierSupport {
-public:
-  explicit DebugInfoVerifier(raw_ostream &OS = dbgs()) : VerifierSupport(OS) {}
-
-  bool verify(const Module &M) {
-    this->M = &M;
-    verifyDebugInfo();
-    return !Broken;
-  }
 
-private:
+  // Module-level debug info verification...
   void verifyDebugInfo();
   void processInstructions(DebugInfoFinder &Finder);
   void processCallInst(DebugInfoFinder &Finder, const CallInst &CI);
@@ -3031,8 +3025,10 @@ void Verifier::visitDbgIntrinsic(StringR
          DII.getRawExpression());
 }
 
-void DebugInfoVerifier::verifyDebugInfo() {
-  if (!VerifyDebugInfo)
+void Verifier::verifyDebugInfo() {
+  // Run the debug info verifier only if the regular verifier succeeds, since
+  // sometimes checks that have already failed will cause crashes here.
+  if (EverBroken || !VerifyDebugInfo)
     return;
 
   DebugInfoFinder Finder;
@@ -3059,7 +3055,7 @@ void DebugInfoVerifier::verifyDebugInfo(
   }
 }
 
-void DebugInfoVerifier::processInstructions(DebugInfoFinder &Finder) {
+void Verifier::processInstructions(DebugInfoFinder &Finder) {
   for (const Function &F : *M)
     for (auto I = inst_begin(&F), E = inst_end(&F); I != E; ++I) {
       if (MDNode *MD = I->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_dbg))
@@ -3069,8 +3065,7 @@ void DebugInfoVerifier::processInstructi
     }
 }
 
-void DebugInfoVerifier::processCallInst(DebugInfoFinder &Finder,
-                                        const CallInst &CI) {
+void Verifier::processCallInst(DebugInfoFinder &Finder, const CallInst &CI) {
   if (Function *F = CI.getCalledFunction())
     if (Intrinsic::ID ID = (Intrinsic::ID)F->getIntrinsicID())
       switch (ID) {
@@ -3112,13 +3107,7 @@ bool llvm::verifyModule(const Module &M,
 
   // Note that this function's return value is inverted from what you would
   // expect of a function called "verify".
-  if (!V.verify(M) || Broken)
-    return true;
-
-  // Run the debug info verifier only if the regular verifier succeeds, since
-  // sometimes checks that have already failed will cause crashes here.
-  DebugInfoVerifier DIV(OS ? *OS : NullStr);
-  return !DIV.verify(M);
+  return !V.verify(M) || Broken;
 }
 
 namespace {
@@ -3147,9 +3136,6 @@ struct VerifierLegacyPass : public Funct
     if (!V.verify(M) && FatalErrors)
       report_fatal_error("Broken module found, compilation aborted!");
 
-    if (!DebugInfoVerifier(dbgs()).verify(M) && FatalErrors)
-      report_fatal_error("Broken module found, compilation aborted!");
-
     return false;
   }