[PATCH] Fix a bug in SROA savings estimation.

[Chandler Carruth]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Easwaran Raman <eraman at google.com> wrote:

> Hi chandlerc,
>
> While estimating SROA savings, we want to see if an address is derived off
> an alloca in the caller. For store instructions, operand 1 is the address
> operand, but the current code checks against operand 0. For clarity, I have
> used getPointerOperand for store and load instructions.
>

Uh.. wow. I mean, this makes sense, but needs a test case.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150318/18290d47/attachment.html>