[PATCH] [ASan] Add process basename to log name and error message to simplify analysis of sanitized systems logs.
Yury Gribov
tetra2005 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 07:20:35 PDT 2015
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
================
Comment at: lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.cc:360
@@ +359,3 @@
+ static bool binary_name_initialized;
+ if (LIKELY(binary_name_initialized))
+ return;
----------------
kcc wrote:
> ygribov wrote:
> > kcc wrote:
> > > This will not catch a situation where someone calls CacheBinaryName() twice, which should be illegal.
> > > Instead, do a hard check that this is the first call.
> > Unfortunately we do have situations where double call is needed e.g. when app is both A- and UB-sanitized.
> I believe the recent refactoring by Alexey allows to solve this.
> Really, if we allow double call but do not allow lazy initialization later on we are asking for trouble.
Could you be more specific? I can see that ASan and UBSan have been changed to have isolated copies of some core structures (e.g. suppressions). But error reporting (e.g. report_file or log_path) are still shared across all sanitizers with mutexes being used to serialize accesses.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7333
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list