[llvm] r231821 - [LAA-memchecks] Comment improvement

[Adam Nemet]

Author: anemet
Date: Tue Mar 10 14:12:41 2015
New Revision: 231821

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=231821&view=rev
Log:
[LAA-memchecks] Comment improvement

I forgot to roll this into r231816.  It was requested by Hal in D8122.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp?rev=231821&r1=231820&r2=231821&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp Tue Mar 10 14:12:41 2015
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ void LoopAccessInfo::analyzeLoop(const V
   if (NumComparisons == 0 && NeedRTCheck)
     NeedRTCheck = false;
 
-  // Check that we did not find an unsizeable pointer.
+  // Check that we found the bounds for the pointer.
   if (CanDoRT)
     DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We can perform a memory runtime check if needed.\n");
   else if (NeedRTCheck) {
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ void LoopAccessInfo::analyzeLoop(const V
 
       CanDoRT = Accesses.canCheckPtrAtRT(PtrRtCheck, NumComparisons, SE,
                                          TheLoop, Strides, true);
-      // Check that we didn't find an unsizeable pointer.
+      // Check that we found the bounds for the pointer.
       if (!CanDoRT && NumComparisons > 0) {
         emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport()
                      << "cannot check memory dependencies at runtime");