[PATCH] Infer known bits from dominating conditions
Philip Reames
listmail at philipreames.com
Mon Mar 9 18:47:09 PDT 2015
Before anyone bothers running test against this, please let me upload one more patch. I took another look and realized that I have a return where I should have a continue or break. (for the dominating check) The good news (I guess) is that I introduced this bug when adding features Hal requested, so my original numbers are still good. Everything after that is meaningless of course. :(
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7708
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list