[PATCH] Infer known bits from dominating conditions

Philip Reames listmail at philipreames.com
Mon Mar 9 18:47:09 PDT 2015


Before anyone bothers running test against this, please let me upload one more patch.  I took another look and realized that I have a return where I should have a continue or break.  (for the dominating check)  The good news (I guess) is that I introduced this bug when adding features Hal requested, so my original numbers are still good.  Everything after that is meaningless of course.  :(


http://reviews.llvm.org/D7708

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/






More information about the llvm-commits mailing list