[PATCH] Reimplement heuristic for estimating complete-unroll optimization effects.
Michael Zolotukhin
mzolotukhin at apple.com
Mon Mar 2 11:40:43 PST 2015
Hi Chandler,
Have had a chance to take a look at the patch?
Thanks,
Michael
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I also checked compile-time impact of the change, and didn't see any noticeable changes when building SPEC2006.
>
> Below are the compile time results:
>
> Test CompleteUnrollOn CompleteUnrollOff
> 400.perlbench 23.55 23.55
> 401.bzip2 2.12 2.10
> 403.gcc 76.42 76.00
> 429.mcf 0.46 0.45
> 445.gobmk 17.93 17.92
> 456.hmmer 5.17 5.17
> 458.sjeng 2.33 2.30
> 462.libquantum 0.72 0.71
> 464.h264ref 12.91 12.80
> 471.omnetpp 34.59 35.06
> 473.astar 0.96 0.96
> 483.xalancbmk 177.89 178.46
>
> I tend to think that the differences are just a noise.
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D7837
>
> EMAIL PREFERENCES
> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>
>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list