[llvm] r230856 - TRE: Just erase dead BBs and tweak the iteration loop not to increment the deleted BB iterator.
Benjamin Kramer
benny.kra at googlemail.com
Sat Feb 28 08:47:28 PST 2015
Author: d0k
Date: Sat Feb 28 10:47:27 2015
New Revision: 230856
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=230856&view=rev
Log:
TRE: Just erase dead BBs and tweak the iteration loop not to increment the deleted BB iterator.
Leaving empty blocks around just opens up a can of bugs like PR22704. Deleting
them early also slightly simplifies code.
Thanks to Sanjay for the IR test case.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/TailCallElim/inf-recursion.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp?rev=230856&r1=230855&r2=230856&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp Sat Feb 28 10:47:27 2015
@@ -403,28 +403,19 @@ bool TailCallElim::runTRE(Function &F) {
// alloca' is changed from being a static alloca to being a dynamic alloca.
// Until this is resolved, disable this transformation if that would ever
// happen. This bug is PR962.
- SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 8> BBToErase;
- for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
+ for (Function::iterator BBI = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BBI != E; /*in loop*/) {
+ BasicBlock *BB = BBI++; // FoldReturnAndProcessPred may delete BB.
if (ReturnInst *Ret = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {
bool Change = ProcessReturningBlock(Ret, OldEntry, TailCallsAreMarkedTail,
ArgumentPHIs, !CanTRETailMarkedCall);
- if (!Change && BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg() == Ret) {
+ if (!Change && BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg() == Ret)
Change = FoldReturnAndProcessPred(BB, Ret, OldEntry,
TailCallsAreMarkedTail, ArgumentPHIs,
!CanTRETailMarkedCall);
- // FoldReturnAndProcessPred may have emptied some BB. Remember to
- // erase them.
- if (Change && BB->empty())
- BBToErase.push_back(BB);
-
- }
MadeChange |= Change;
}
}
- for (auto BB: BBToErase)
- BB->eraseFromParent();
-
// If we eliminated any tail recursions, it's possible that we inserted some
// silly PHI nodes which just merge an initial value (the incoming operand)
// with themselves. Check to see if we did and clean up our mess if so. This
@@ -831,14 +822,11 @@ bool TailCallElim::FoldReturnAndProcessP
ReturnInst *RI = FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch(Ret, BB, Pred);
// Cleanup: if all predecessors of BB have been eliminated by
- // FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch, we would like to delete it, but we
- // can not just nuke it as it is being used as an iterator by our caller.
- // Just empty it, and the caller will erase it when it is safe to do so.
- // It is important to empty it, because the ret instruction in there is
- // still using a value which EliminateRecursiveTailCall will attempt
- // to remove.
+ // FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch, delete it. It is important to empty it,
+ // because the ret instruction in there is still using a value which
+ // EliminateRecursiveTailCall will attempt to remove.
if (!BB->hasAddressTaken() && pred_begin(BB) == pred_end(BB))
- BB->getInstList().clear();
+ BB->eraseFromParent();
EliminateRecursiveTailCall(CI, RI, OldEntry, TailCallsAreMarkedTail,
ArgumentPHIs,
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/TailCallElim/inf-recursion.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/TailCallElim/inf-recursion.ll?rev=230856&r1=230855&r2=230856&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/TailCallElim/inf-recursion.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/TailCallElim/inf-recursion.ll Sat Feb 28 10:47:27 2015
@@ -31,3 +31,24 @@ define float @fabsf(float %f) {
}
declare x86_fp80 @fabsl(x86_fp80 %f)
+
+; Don't crash while transforming a function with infinite recursion.
+define i32 @PR22704(i1 %bool) {
+entry:
+ br i1 %bool, label %t, label %f
+
+t:
+ %call1 = call i32 @PR22704(i1 1)
+ br label %return
+
+f:
+ %call = call i32 @PR22704(i1 1)
+ br label %return
+
+return:
+ ret i32 0
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @PR22704(
+; CHECK: %bool.tr = phi i1 [ %bool, %entry ], [ true, %t ], [ true, %f ]
+; CHECK: br i1 %bool.tr, label %t, label %f
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list