[PATCH] [lld] Revive standalone CMake build

[Michael Spencer]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
> My position remains that this isn't really that useful or worth the
> maintenance burden that it brings. But I'm not really one of the primary
> developers on LLD. I've just not had any trouble just enabling sanitizers in
> the LLVM build to check LLD, nor have I heard complaints about this from
> others.
>
> That's why I'm silent here. If the LLD developers really want this, they
> would probably show up and review it. My guess is that it doesn't solve an
> important problem for them, but I can only speculate.

We already removed the standalone build once. I don't think the
benefits of it are worth the maintenance costs.

- Michael Spencer

>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ping
>>
>>
>> REPOSITORY
>>   rL LLVM
>>
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D7625
>>
>> EMAIL PREFERENCES
>>   http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>