Convert aggregate loads/stroes into scalar load/stores
deadal nix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 17:53:03 PST 2015
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7780
For a dumbed down first version, in order to ease review.
2015-02-13 0:33 GMT-08:00 deadal nix <deadalnix at gmail.com>:
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D7607
>
> 2015-02-12 17:20 GMT-08:00 Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>:
>
> Can you throw this on phabricator to simplify review? I see a couple of
>> nits.
>>
>> Thanks for pursuing this. I really want to see this land.
>>
>> Philip
>>
>>
>> On 02/11/2015 10:44 AM, deadal nix wrote:
>>
>> As per title.
>>
>> For reference:
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140929/238371.html
>>
>> Last time, the discussion lead to the conclusion that the best way to do
>> it was to convert these into stores/loads of scalar representing the whole
>> struct or array. I finally had some time to get back to this, and here is
>> the result.
>>
>> It comes with testing and all, and seems fairly low risk to me, as
>> support for aggregate load/store is almost non existent at this point.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing listllvm-commits at cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150220/35e32a34/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list