[llvm] r229889 - Revert "Reformat."

Adam Nemet anemet at apple.com
Thu Feb 19 11:14:35 PST 2015


Author: anemet
Date: Thu Feb 19 13:14:34 2015
New Revision: 229889

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=229889&view=rev
Log:
Revert "Reformat."

This reverts commit r229651.

I'd like to ultimately revert r229650 but this reformat stands in the
way.  I'll reformat the affected files once the the loop-access pass is
fully committed.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h
    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h?rev=229889&r1=229888&r2=229889&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h Thu Feb 19 13:14:34 2015
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ public:
   /// \brief Emit an analysis note with the debug location from the instruction
   /// in \p Message if available.  Otherwise use the location of \p TheLoop.
   static void emitAnalysis(VectorizationReport &Message,
-                           const Function *TheFunction, const Loop *TheLoop);
+                           const Function *TheFunction,
+                           const Loop *TheLoop);
 };
 
 /// \brief Drive the analysis of memory accesses in the loop
@@ -89,13 +90,14 @@ public:
     /// make more than this number of comparisons.
     unsigned RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold;
 
-    VectorizerParams(unsigned MaxVectorWidth, unsigned VectorizationFactor,
+    VectorizerParams(unsigned MaxVectorWidth,
+                     unsigned VectorizationFactor,
                      unsigned VectorizationInterleave,
-                     unsigned RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold)
-        : MaxVectorWidth(MaxVectorWidth),
-          VectorizationFactor(VectorizationFactor),
-          VectorizationInterleave(VectorizationInterleave),
-          RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold(RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold) {}
+                     unsigned RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold) :
+        MaxVectorWidth(MaxVectorWidth),
+        VectorizationFactor(VectorizationFactor),
+        VectorizationInterleave(VectorizationInterleave),
+        RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold(RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold) {}
   };
 
   /// This struct holds information about the memory runtime legality check that
@@ -142,10 +144,10 @@ public:
   LoopAccessInfo(Function *F, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE,
                  const DataLayout *DL, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI,
                  AliasAnalysis *AA, DominatorTree *DT,
-                 const VectorizerParams &VectParams)
-      : TheFunction(F), TheLoop(L), SE(SE), DL(DL), TLI(TLI), AA(AA), DT(DT),
-        NumLoads(0), NumStores(0), MaxSafeDepDistBytes(-1U),
-        VectParams(VectParams) {}
+                 const VectorizerParams &VectParams) :
+      TheFunction(F), TheLoop(L), SE(SE), DL(DL), TLI(TLI), AA(AA), DT(DT),
+      NumLoads(0), NumStores(0), MaxSafeDepDistBytes(-1U),
+      VectParams(VectParams) {}
 
   /// Return true we can analyze the memory accesses in the loop and there are
   /// no memory dependence cycles.  Replaces symbolic strides using Strides.

Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h?rev=229889&r1=229888&r2=229889&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h Thu Feb 19 13:14:34 2015
@@ -269,23 +269,23 @@ void initializeDataLayoutPassPass(PassRe
 void initializeTargetTransformInfoWrapperPassPass(PassRegistry &);
 void initializeTargetLibraryInfoWrapperPassPass(PassRegistry &);
 void initializeAssumptionCacheTrackerPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeTwoAddressInstructionPassPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeTypeBasedAliasAnalysisPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeScopedNoAliasAAPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeUnifyFunctionExitNodesPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeUnreachableBlockElimPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeUnreachableMachineBlockElimPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeVerifierLegacyPassPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeVirtRegMapPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeVirtRegRewriterPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeInstSimplifierPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeUnpackMachineBundlesPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeFinalizeMachineBundlesPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeLoopVectorizePass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeSLPVectorizerPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeBBVectorizePass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeMachineFunctionPrinterPassPass(PassRegistry &);
-void initializeStackMapLivenessPass(PassRegistry &);
+void initializeTwoAddressInstructionPassPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeTypeBasedAliasAnalysisPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeScopedNoAliasAAPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeUnifyFunctionExitNodesPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeUnreachableBlockElimPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeUnreachableMachineBlockElimPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeVerifierLegacyPassPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeVirtRegMapPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeVirtRegRewriterPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeInstSimplifierPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeUnpackMachineBundlesPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeFinalizeMachineBundlesPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeLoopVectorizePass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeSLPVectorizerPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeBBVectorizePass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeMachineFunctionPrinterPassPass(PassRegistry&);
+void initializeStackMapLivenessPass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeMachineCombinerPass(PassRegistry &);
 void initializeLoadCombinePass(PassRegistry&);
 void initializeRewriteSymbolsPass(PassRegistry&);

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp?rev=229889&r1=229888&r2=229889&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp Thu Feb 19 13:14:34 2015
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ bool AccessAnalysis::canCheckPtrAtRT(
       unsigned ASj = PtrJ->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();
       if (ASi != ASj) {
         DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Runtime check would require comparison between"
-                        " different address spaces\n");
+                       " different address spaces\n");
         return false;
       }
     }
@@ -553,8 +553,8 @@ static int isStridedPtr(ScalarEvolution
   // Make sure that the pointer does not point to aggregate types.
   const PointerType *PtrTy = cast<PointerType>(Ty);
   if (PtrTy->getElementType()->isAggregateType()) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not a pointer to a scalar type" << *Ptr
-                 << "\n");
+    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not a pointer to a scalar type" << *Ptr <<
+          "\n");
     return 0;
   }
 
@@ -562,15 +562,15 @@ static int isStridedPtr(ScalarEvolution
 
   const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(PtrScev);
   if (!AR) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not an AddRecExpr pointer " << *Ptr
-                 << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
+    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not an AddRecExpr pointer "
+          << *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
     return 0;
   }
 
   // The accesss function must stride over the innermost loop.
   if (Lp != AR->getLoop()) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not striding over innermost loop " << *Ptr
-                 << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
+    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not striding over innermost loop " <<
+          *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
   }
 
   // The address calculation must not wrap. Otherwise, a dependence could be
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static int isStridedPtr(ScalarEvolution
   bool IsInAddressSpaceZero = PtrTy->getAddressSpace() == 0;
   if (!IsNoWrapAddRec && !IsInBoundsGEP && !IsInAddressSpaceZero) {
     DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Pointer may wrap in the address space "
-                 << *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
+          << *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
     return 0;
   }
 
@@ -595,8 +595,8 @@ static int isStridedPtr(ScalarEvolution
   // Calculate the pointer stride and check if it is consecutive.
   const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Step);
   if (!C) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not a constant strided " << *Ptr
-                 << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
+    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Bad stride - Not a constant strided " << *Ptr <<
+          " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n");
     return 0;
   }
 
@@ -638,9 +638,8 @@ bool MemoryDepChecker::couldPreventStore
   // Store-load forwarding distance.
   const unsigned NumCyclesForStoreLoadThroughMemory = 8*TypeByteSize;
   // Maximum vector factor.
-  unsigned MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues =
-      VectParams.MaxVectorWidth * TypeByteSize;
-  if (MaxSafeDepDistBytes < MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues)
+  unsigned MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues = VectParams.MaxVectorWidth*TypeByteSize;
+  if(MaxSafeDepDistBytes < MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues)
     MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues = MaxSafeDepDistBytes;
 
   for (unsigned vf = 2*TypeByteSize; vf <= MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues;
@@ -651,14 +650,14 @@ bool MemoryDepChecker::couldPreventStore
     }
   }
 
-  if (MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues < 2 * TypeByteSize) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Distance " << Distance
-                 << " that could cause a store-load forwarding conflict\n");
+  if (MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues< 2*TypeByteSize) {
+    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Distance " << Distance <<
+          " that could cause a store-load forwarding conflict\n");
     return true;
   }
 
   if (MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues < MaxSafeDepDistBytes &&
-      MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues != VectParams.MaxVectorWidth * TypeByteSize)
+      MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues != VectParams.MaxVectorWidth*TypeByteSize)
     MaxSafeDepDistBytes = MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues;
   return false;
 }
@@ -706,9 +705,9 @@ bool MemoryDepChecker::isDependent(const
   const SCEV *Dist = SE->getMinusSCEV(Sink, Src);
 
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Src Scev: " << *Src << "Sink Scev: " << *Sink
-               << "(Induction step: " << StrideAPtr << ")\n");
+        << "(Induction step: " << StrideAPtr <<  ")\n");
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Distance for " << *InstMap[AIdx] << " to "
-               << *InstMap[BIdx] << ": " << *Dist << "\n");
+        << *InstMap[BIdx] << ": " << *Dist << "\n");
 
   // Need consecutive accesses. We don't want to vectorize
   // "A[B[i]] += ..." and similar code or pointer arithmetic that could wrap in
@@ -755,19 +754,18 @@ bool MemoryDepChecker::isDependent(const
 
   // Positive distance bigger than max vectorization factor.
   if (ATy != BTy) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs()
-          << "LV: ReadWrite-Write positive dependency with different types\n");
+    DEBUG(dbgs() <<
+          "LV: ReadWrite-Write positive dependency with different types\n");
     return false;
   }
 
   unsigned Distance = (unsigned) Val.getZExtValue();
 
   // Bail out early if passed-in parameters make vectorization not feasible.
-  unsigned ForcedFactor =
-      (VectParams.VectorizationFactor ? VectParams.VectorizationFactor : 1);
-  unsigned ForcedUnroll =
-      (VectParams.VectorizationInterleave ? VectParams.VectorizationInterleave
-                                          : 1);
+  unsigned ForcedFactor = (VectParams.VectorizationFactor ?
+                           VectParams.VectorizationFactor : 1);
+  unsigned ForcedUnroll = (VectParams.VectorizationInterleave ?
+                           VectParams.VectorizationInterleave : 1);
 
   // The distance must be bigger than the size needed for a vectorized version
   // of the operation and the size of the vectorized operation must not be
@@ -776,7 +774,7 @@ bool MemoryDepChecker::isDependent(const
       2*TypeByteSize > MaxSafeDepDistBytes ||
       Distance < TypeByteSize * ForcedUnroll * ForcedFactor) {
     DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Failure because of Positive distance "
-                 << Val.getSExtValue() << '\n');
+        << Val.getSExtValue() << '\n');
     return true;
   }
 
@@ -788,9 +786,8 @@ bool MemoryDepChecker::isDependent(const
       couldPreventStoreLoadForward(Distance, TypeByteSize))
      return true;
 
-  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Positive distance " << Val.getSExtValue()
-               << " with max VF = " << MaxSafeDepDistBytes / TypeByteSize
-               << '\n');
+  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Positive distance " << Val.getSExtValue() <<
+        " with max VF = " << MaxSafeDepDistBytes / TypeByteSize << '\n');
 
   return false;
 }
@@ -889,8 +886,8 @@ bool LoopAccessInfo::canVectorizeMemory(
       if (it->mayWriteToMemory()) {
         StoreInst *St = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(it);
         if (!St) {
-          emitAnalysis(VectorizationReport(it)
-                       << "instruction cannot be vectorized");
+          emitAnalysis(VectorizationReport(it) <<
+                       "instruction cannot be vectorized");
           return false;
         }
         if (!St->isSimple() && !IsAnnotatedParallel) {
@@ -956,8 +953,9 @@ bool LoopAccessInfo::canVectorizeMemory(
   }
 
   if (IsAnnotatedParallel) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: A loop annotated parallel, ignore memory dependency "
-                 << "checks.\n");
+    DEBUG(dbgs()
+          << "LV: A loop annotated parallel, ignore memory dependency "
+          << "checks.\n");
     return true;
   }
 
@@ -1009,8 +1007,8 @@ bool LoopAccessInfo::canVectorizeMemory(
     CanDoRT = Accesses.canCheckPtrAtRT(PtrRtCheck, NumComparisons, SE, TheLoop,
                                        Strides);
 
-  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We need to do " << NumComparisons
-               << " pointer comparisons.\n");
+  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We need to do " << NumComparisons <<
+        " pointer comparisons.\n");
 
   // If we only have one set of dependences to check pointers among we don't
   // need a runtime check.
@@ -1030,8 +1028,8 @@ bool LoopAccessInfo::canVectorizeMemory(
 
   if (NeedRTCheck && !CanDoRT) {
     emitAnalysis(VectorizationReport() << "cannot identify array bounds");
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We can't vectorize because we can't find "
-                 << "the array bounds.\n");
+    DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We can't vectorize because we can't find " <<
+          "the array bounds.\n");
     PtrRtCheck.reset();
     return false;
   }
@@ -1078,11 +1076,11 @@ bool LoopAccessInfo::canVectorizeMemory(
   }
 
   if (!CanVecMem)
-    emitAnalysis(VectorizationReport()
-                 << "unsafe dependent memory operations in loop");
+    emitAnalysis(VectorizationReport() <<
+                 "unsafe dependent memory operations in loop");
 
-  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We" << (NeedRTCheck ? "" : " don't")
-               << " need a runtime memory check.\n");
+  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We" << (NeedRTCheck ? "" : " don't") <<
+        " need a runtime memory check.\n");
 
   return CanVecMem;
 }
@@ -1134,8 +1132,8 @@ LoopAccessInfo::addRuntimeCheck(Instruct
     const SCEV *Sc = SE->getSCEV(Ptr);
 
     if (SE->isLoopInvariant(Sc, TheLoop)) {
-      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Adding RT check for a loop invariant ptr:" << *Ptr
-                   << "\n");
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Adding RT check for a loop invariant ptr:" <<
+            *Ptr <<"\n");
       Starts.push_back(Ptr);
       Ends.push_back(Ptr);
     } else {

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp?rev=229889&r1=229888&r2=229889&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp Thu Feb 19 13:14:34 2015
@@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ STATISTIC(LoopsVectorized, "Number of lo
 STATISTIC(LoopsAnalyzed, "Number of loops analyzed for vectorization");
 
 static cl::opt<unsigned>
-    VectorizationFactor("force-vector-width", cl::init(0), cl::Hidden,
-                        cl::desc("Sets the SIMD width. Zero is autoselect."));
+VectorizationFactor("force-vector-width", cl::init(0), cl::Hidden,
+                    cl::desc("Sets the SIMD width. Zero is autoselect."));
 
 static cl::opt<unsigned>
-    VectorizationInterleave("force-vector-interleave", cl::init(0), cl::Hidden,
-                            cl::desc("Sets the vectorization interleave count. "
-                                     "Zero is autoselect."));
+VectorizationInterleave("force-vector-interleave", cl::init(0), cl::Hidden,
+                    cl::desc("Sets the vectorization interleave count. "
+                             "Zero is autoselect."));
 
 static cl::opt<bool>
 EnableIfConversion("enable-if-conversion", cl::init(true), cl::Hidden,
@@ -548,8 +548,9 @@ public:
                             DominatorTree *DT, TargetLibraryInfo *TLI,
                             AliasAnalysis *AA, Function *F,
                             const TargetTransformInfo *TTI)
-      : NumPredStores(0), TheLoop(L), SE(SE), DL(DL), TLI(TLI), TheFunction(F),
-        TTI(TTI), DT(DT), Induction(nullptr), WidestIndTy(nullptr),
+      : NumPredStores(0), TheLoop(L), SE(SE), DL(DL),
+        TLI(TLI), TheFunction(F), TTI(TTI), DT(DT), Induction(nullptr),
+        WidestIndTy(nullptr),
         LAI(F, L, SE, DL, TLI, AA, DT,
             LoopAccessInfo::VectorizerParams(
                 MaxVectorWidth, VectorizationFactor, VectorizationInterleave,
@@ -743,7 +744,9 @@ public:
     return LAI.getRuntimePointerCheck();
   }
 
-  LoopAccessInfo *getLAI() { return &LAI; }
+  LoopAccessInfo *getLAI() {
+    return &LAI;
+  }
 
   /// This function returns the identity element (or neutral element) for
   /// the operation K.
@@ -770,11 +773,18 @@ public:
   }
   /// Returns true if vector representation of the instruction \p I
   /// requires mask.
-  bool isMaskRequired(const Instruction *I) { return (MaskedOp.count(I) != 0); }
-  unsigned getNumStores() const { return LAI.getNumStores(); }
-  unsigned getNumLoads() const { return LAI.getNumLoads(); }
-  unsigned getNumPredStores() const { return NumPredStores; }
-
+  bool isMaskRequired(const Instruction* I) {
+    return (MaskedOp.count(I) != 0);
+  }
+  unsigned getNumStores() const {
+    return LAI.getNumStores();
+  }
+  unsigned getNumLoads() const {
+    return LAI.getNumLoads();
+  }
+  unsigned getNumPredStores() const {
+    return NumPredStores;
+  }
 private:
   /// Check if a single basic block loop is vectorizable.
   /// At this point we know that this is a loop with a constant trip count
@@ -865,7 +875,7 @@ private:
   SmallPtrSet<Value*, 4> AllowedExit;
   /// This set holds the variables which are known to be uniform after
   /// vectorization.
-  SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 4> Uniforms;
+  SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> Uniforms;
   LoopAccessInfo LAI;
   /// Can we assume the absence of NaNs.
   bool HasFunNoNaNAttr;
@@ -1649,7 +1659,9 @@ int LoopVectorizationLegality::isConsecu
   return 0;
 }
 
-bool LoopVectorizationLegality::isUniform(Value *V) { return LAI.isUniform(V); }
+bool LoopVectorizationLegality::isUniform(Value *V) {
+  return LAI.isUniform(V);
+}
 
 InnerLoopVectorizer::VectorParts&
 InnerLoopVectorizer::getVectorValue(Value *V) {
@@ -3387,10 +3399,10 @@ bool LoopVectorizationLegality::canVecto
   // Collect all of the variables that remain uniform after vectorization.
   collectLoopUniforms();
 
-  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We can vectorize this loop"
-               << (LAI.getRuntimePointerCheck()->Need
-                       ? " (with a runtime bound check)"
-                       : "") << "!\n");
+  DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: We can vectorize this loop" <<
+        (LAI.getRuntimePointerCheck()->Need ? " (with a runtime bound check)" :
+         "")
+        <<"!\n");
 
   // Okay! We can vectorize. At this point we don't have any other mem analysis
   // which may limit our maximum vectorization factor, so just return true with





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list