[PATCH] Fix a crash in the assumption cache when inlining indirect function calls
Phabricator
reviews at reviews.llvm.org
Thu Feb 12 13:06:24 PST 2015
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7533
Files:
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
const TargetTransformInfo &TTI;
/// The cache of @llvm.assume intrinsics.
- AssumptionCache ∾
+ AssumptionCacheTracker *ACT;
// The called function.
Function &F;
@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@
public:
CallAnalyzer(const DataLayout *DL, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
- AssumptionCache &AC, Function &Callee, int Threshold)
- : DL(DL), TTI(TTI), AC(AC), F(Callee), Threshold(Threshold), Cost(0),
+ AssumptionCacheTracker *ACT, Function &Callee, int Threshold)
+ : DL(DL), TTI(TTI), ACT(ACT), F(Callee), Threshold(Threshold), Cost(0),
IsCallerRecursive(false), IsRecursiveCall(false),
ExposesReturnsTwice(false), HasDynamicAlloca(false),
ContainsNoDuplicateCall(false), HasReturn(false), HasIndirectBr(false),
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@
// during devirtualization and so we want to give it a hefty bonus for
// inlining, but cap that bonus in the event that inlining wouldn't pan
// out. Pretend to inline the function, with a custom threshold.
- CallAnalyzer CA(DL, TTI, AC, *F, InlineConstants::IndirectCallThreshold);
+ CallAnalyzer CA(DL, TTI, ACT, *F, InlineConstants::IndirectCallThreshold);
if (CA.analyzeCall(CS)) {
// We were able to inline the indirect call! Subtract the cost from the
// bonus we want to apply, but don't go below zero.
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@
// the ephemeral values multiple times (and they're completely determined by
// the callee, so this is purely duplicate work).
SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 32> EphValues;
- CodeMetrics::collectEphemeralValues(&F, &AC, EphValues);
+ CodeMetrics::collectEphemeralValues(&F, &ACT->getAssumptionCache(F), EphValues);
// The worklist of live basic blocks in the callee *after* inlining. We avoid
// adding basic blocks of the callee which can be proven to be dead for this
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@
<< "...\n");
CallAnalyzer CA(Callee->getDataLayout(), TTIWP->getTTI(*Callee),
- ACT->getAssumptionCache(*Callee), *Callee, Threshold);
+ ACT, *Callee, Threshold);
bool ShouldInline = CA.analyzeCall(CS);
DEBUG(CA.dump());
Index: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Inline/inline-indirect.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -inline -disable-output 2>/dev/null
+; This test used to trigger an assertion in the assumption cache when
+; inlining the indirect call
+declare void @llvm.assume(i1)
+
+define void @foo() {
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @bar(void ()*) {
+ call void @llvm.assume(i1 true)
+ call void %0();
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @baz() {
+ call void @bar(void ()* @foo)
+ ret void
+}
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D7533.19854.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3037 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150212/361f3c56/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list